Abstract: Because of the various disciplinary backgrounds of the assessment panel in interdisciplinary peer review, it is quite difficult for them to provide accurate and comprehensive evaluation on the research results from other disciplines. This paper explores the issue of rationality in interdisciplinary peer review. On this basis, it proposes that reasonable dialogue mechanism should be established among different disciplines, and for the sake of the enough development space for the scientific explorations, especially the interdisciplinary researches, we should keep the essential tension between normalization and innovation in academic research.

摘要： 跨学科评议的评审专家专业背景各异，在评审非本专业的成果时很难准确和全面。本文探讨了跨学科同行评议的合理性问题，并在此基础上提出需要建立不同学科之间合理的对话机制，保持学术研究的规范性和创新性之间必要的张力，为科学探索特别是跨学科研究创造足够的发展空间。

关键词: 跨学科, 同行评议, 合理性, Interdiscipline, Peer-review, Rationality