Studies in Science of Science ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (10): 2144-2155.
• Innovation Explorations • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Yong-zheng, CAI Li, CHEN Zi-ying(
)
Received:2025-07-26
Revised:2026-06-08
Online:2026-10-15
Published:2026-10-10
通讯作者:
陈姿颖(1997-),女,博士研究生,E-mail:作者简介:王永正(1994-),男,博士研究生。基金资助:CLC Number:
WANG Yong-zheng, CAI Li, CHEN Zi-ying. Collaborative R&D of agribusiness and the realization of innovative entrepreneurial opportunities[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2026, 44(10): 2144-2155.
王永正, 蔡莉, 陈姿颖. 涉农企业合作研发与创新型创业机会实现[J]. 科学学研究, 2026, 44(10): 2144-2155.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://kxxyj.magtechjournal.com/kxxyj/EN/
https://kxxyj.magtechjournal.com/kxxyj/EN/Y2026/V44/I10/2144
| 变量 | 校准锚点 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 完全隶属点 | 交叉点 | 完全不隶属点 | |
| CIO | 5.889 | 4.505 | 3.746 |
| CIA | 7.369 | 1.841 | 0.250 |
| IPP | 84.548 | 74.140 | 55.753 |
| ME | 15.80 | 12.337 | 6.772 |
| KRC | 3.621 | 1.322 | 0.405 |
Table 1 Calibration anchors for each variable
| 变量 | 校准锚点 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 完全隶属点 | 交叉点 | 完全不隶属点 | |
| CIO | 5.889 | 4.505 | 3.746 |
| CIA | 7.369 | 1.841 | 0.250 |
| IPP | 84.548 | 74.140 | 55.753 |
| ME | 15.80 | 12.337 | 6.772 |
| KRC | 3.621 | 1.322 | 0.405 |
| 条件变量 | High KRC | Non-high KRC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 一致性 | 覆盖率 | 一致性 | 覆盖率 | |
| CIO | 0.664 | 0.638 | 0.625 | 0.660 |
| ~CIO | 0.645 | 0.609 | 0.657 | 0.683 |
| CIA | 0.587 | 0.623 | 0.605 | 0.706 |
| ~CIA | 0.723 | 0.624 | 0.677 | 0.643 |
| ME | 0.633 | 0.574 | 0.720 | 0.718 |
| ~ME | 0.688 | 0.691 | 0.572 | 0.632 |
| IPP | 0.601 | 0.565 | 0.672 | 0.695 |
| ~IPP | 0.675 | 0.652 | 0.579 | 0.615 |
Table 2 Analysis of necessary conditions for the creation of knowledge recombination creation
| 条件变量 | High KRC | Non-high KRC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 一致性 | 覆盖率 | 一致性 | 覆盖率 | |
| CIO | 0.664 | 0.638 | 0.625 | 0.660 |
| ~CIO | 0.645 | 0.609 | 0.657 | 0.683 |
| CIA | 0.587 | 0.623 | 0.605 | 0.706 |
| ~CIA | 0.723 | 0.624 | 0.677 | 0.643 |
| ME | 0.633 | 0.574 | 0.720 | 0.718 |
| ~ME | 0.688 | 0.691 | 0.572 | 0.632 |
| IPP | 0.601 | 0.565 | 0.672 | 0.695 |
| ~IPP | 0.675 | 0.652 | 0.579 | 0.615 |
| 因素类别 | 前因变量 | High KRC | Non-high KRC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | S2 | S3 | M1 | ||
| 动机 | CIO | ● | ● | ● | $\bigotimes$ |
| 能力 | CIA | $\bigotimes$ | ● | ● | $\bigotimes$ |
| 触发器 | ME | $\bigotimes$ | ● | $\bigotimes$ | ● |
| IPP | $\bigotimes$ | $\bigotimes$ | ● | ● | |
| 一致性 | 0.373 | 0.275 | 0.286 | 0.393 | |
| 原始覆盖率 | 0.110 | 0.023 | 0.013 | 0.393 | |
| 唯一覆盖率 | 0.837 | 0.889 | 0.884 | 0.841 | |
| 总体解一致性 | 0.426 | 0.393 | |||
| 总体解覆盖度 | 0.822 | 0.841 | |||
Table 3 Analysis of groupings leading to the creation of high/non-high knowledge recombination creation
| 因素类别 | 前因变量 | High KRC | Non-high KRC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | S2 | S3 | M1 | ||
| 动机 | CIO | ● | ● | ● | $\bigotimes$ |
| 能力 | CIA | $\bigotimes$ | ● | ● | $\bigotimes$ |
| 触发器 | ME | $\bigotimes$ | ● | $\bigotimes$ | ● |
| IPP | $\bigotimes$ | $\bigotimes$ | ● | ● | |
| 一致性 | 0.373 | 0.275 | 0.286 | 0.393 | |
| 原始覆盖率 | 0.110 | 0.023 | 0.013 | 0.393 | |
| 唯一覆盖率 | 0.837 | 0.889 | 0.884 | 0.841 | |
| 总体解一致性 | 0.426 | 0.393 | |||
| 总体解覆盖度 | 0.822 | 0.841 | |||
| 因素类别 | 前因变量 | High KRC (案例频数=4) | High KRC (PRI=0.65) | High KRC (原始一致性阈值=0.86) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S4 | S5 | S6 | |||
| 动机 | CIO | ● | ● | ● | |
| 能力 | CIA | $\bigotimes$ | ● | ● | |
| 触发器 | ME | ⊗ | $\bigotimes$ | ● | |
| IPP | $\bigotimes$ | ● | $\bigotimes$ | ||
| 一致性 | 0.373 | 0.285 | 0.275 | ||
| 原始覆盖率 | 0.373 | 0.041 | 0.031 | ||
| 唯一覆盖率 | 0.837 | 0.884 | 0.889 | ||
| 总体解一致性 | 0.373 | 0.317 | |||
| 总体解覆盖度 | 0.837 | 0.873 | |||
Table 4 Robustness test
| 因素类别 | 前因变量 | High KRC (案例频数=4) | High KRC (PRI=0.65) | High KRC (原始一致性阈值=0.86) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S4 | S5 | S6 | |||
| 动机 | CIO | ● | ● | ● | |
| 能力 | CIA | $\bigotimes$ | ● | ● | |
| 触发器 | ME | ⊗ | $\bigotimes$ | ● | |
| IPP | $\bigotimes$ | ● | $\bigotimes$ | ||
| 一致性 | 0.373 | 0.285 | 0.275 | ||
| 原始覆盖率 | 0.373 | 0.041 | 0.031 | ||
| 唯一覆盖率 | 0.837 | 0.884 | 0.889 | ||
| 总体解一致性 | 0.373 | 0.317 | |||
| 总体解覆盖度 | 0.837 | 0.873 | |||
| 类型 | 变量名 | 平均值 | 标准差 | 最小值 | 最大值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 因变量 | IEO | 0.206 | 0.107 | -0.001 | 0.581 |
| 自变量 | 组态S1 | 0.212 | 0.187 | 0 | 0.740 |
| 组态S2 | 0.147 | 0.122 | 0 | 0.560 | |
| 组态S3 | 0.154 | 0.126 | 0 | 0.530 | |
| 中介变量 | KRC | 1.626 | 1.115 | 0.223 | 5.307 |
| 控制变量 | IP | 0.977 | 1.280 | 0 | 4.916 |
| UP | 0.549 | 1.030 | 0 | 4.245 | |
| GR | 0.133 | 0.143 | -0.153 | 0.694 | |
| FC | -3.854 | 0.495 | -4.541 | -0.927 | |
| RDI | 0.072 | 0.125 | 0 | 0.603 |
Table 5 Descriptive statistics
| 类型 | 变量名 | 平均值 | 标准差 | 最小值 | 最大值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 因变量 | IEO | 0.206 | 0.107 | -0.001 | 0.581 |
| 自变量 | 组态S1 | 0.212 | 0.187 | 0 | 0.740 |
| 组态S2 | 0.147 | 0.122 | 0 | 0.560 | |
| 组态S3 | 0.154 | 0.126 | 0 | 0.530 | |
| 中介变量 | KRC | 1.626 | 1.115 | 0.223 | 5.307 |
| 控制变量 | IP | 0.977 | 1.280 | 0 | 4.916 |
| UP | 0.549 | 1.030 | 0 | 4.245 | |
| GR | 0.133 | 0.143 | -0.153 | 0.694 | |
| FC | -3.854 | 0.495 | -4.541 | -0.927 | |
| RDI | 0.072 | 0.125 | 0 | 0.603 |
| 因变量:IEO | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | |
| 组态S1 | 0.142*** (2.790) | ||
| 组态S2 | 0.228*** (3.060) | ||
| 组态S3 | 0.225*** (3.050) | ||
| IP | 0.041*** (5.260) | 0.038*** (4.880) | 0.039*** (4.990) |
| UP | -0.023*** (-2.880) | -0.017** (-2.220) | -0.016** (-2.090) |
| GR | 0.202*** (3.170) | 0.178*** (2.800) | 0.167*** (2.600) |
| FC | -0.024** (-2.510) | -0.019** (-2.020) | -0.021** (-2.280) |
| RDI | -0.239*** (-3.140) | -0.206*** (-2.810) | -0.228*** (-3.060) |
| 常数项 | 0.056 (1.370) | 0.070* (1.770) | 0.061 (1.540) |
| 观测值 | 94 | 94 | 94 |
| 调整后拟合优度 | 0.342 | 0.353 | 0.352 |
Table 6 Regression analysis of collaborative R&D grouping patterns on the realization of innovative entrepreneurial opportunities
| 因变量:IEO | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | |
| 组态S1 | 0.142*** (2.790) | ||
| 组态S2 | 0.228*** (3.060) | ||
| 组态S3 | 0.225*** (3.050) | ||
| IP | 0.041*** (5.260) | 0.038*** (4.880) | 0.039*** (4.990) |
| UP | -0.023*** (-2.880) | -0.017** (-2.220) | -0.016** (-2.090) |
| GR | 0.202*** (3.170) | 0.178*** (2.800) | 0.167*** (2.600) |
| FC | -0.024** (-2.510) | -0.019** (-2.020) | -0.021** (-2.280) |
| RDI | -0.239*** (-3.140) | -0.206*** (-2.810) | -0.228*** (-3.060) |
| 常数项 | 0.056 (1.370) | 0.070* (1.770) | 0.061 (1.540) |
| 观测值 | 94 | 94 | 94 |
| 调整后拟合优度 | 0.342 | 0.353 | 0.352 |
| 因变量:IEO(除去极端值) | 因变量:IEO(用赫芬达尔指数来测量市场竞争优势) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型4 | 模型5 | 模型6 | 模型7 | 模型8 | 模型9 | |
| 组态S1 | 0.142*** (2.790) | 1.668** (2.060) | ||||
| 组态S2 | 0.228*** (3.060) | 2.735** (2.300) | ||||
| 组态S3 | 0.225*** (3.050) | 3.034*** (2.600) | ||||
| IP | 0.041*** (5.260) | 0.038*** (4.880) | 0.039*** (4.990) | 0.269** (2.150) | 0.228* (1.840) | 0.237* (1.920) |
| UP | -0.023*** (-2.880) | -0.017** (-2.220) | -0.016** (-2.090) | -0.166 (-1.320) | -0.101 (-0.820) | -0.085 (-0.690) |
| GR | 0.202*** (3.170) | 0.178*** (2.800) | 0.167*** (2.600) | -0.865 (-0.850) | -1.155 (-1.130) | -1.336 (-1.310) |
| FC | -0.024** (-2.510) | -0.019** (-2.020) | -0.021** (-2.280) | -0.246 (-1.640) | -0.190 (-1.270) | -0.217 (-1.470) |
| RDI | -0.239*** (-3.140) | -0.206*** (-2.810) | -0.228*** (-3.060) | -0.116 (-0.110) | 0.266 (0.230) | -0.049 (-0.040) |
| 常数项 | 0.056 (1.370) | 0.070* (1.770) | 0.061 (1.540) | 0.612 (0.940) | 0.766 (1.220) | 0.623 (0.990) |
| 观测值 | 94 | 94 | 94 | 94 | 94 | 94 |
| 调整后拟合优度 | 0.342 | 0.353 | 0.352 | 0.048 | 0.059 | 0.074 |
Table 7 Robustness test
| 因变量:IEO(除去极端值) | 因变量:IEO(用赫芬达尔指数来测量市场竞争优势) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型4 | 模型5 | 模型6 | 模型7 | 模型8 | 模型9 | |
| 组态S1 | 0.142*** (2.790) | 1.668** (2.060) | ||||
| 组态S2 | 0.228*** (3.060) | 2.735** (2.300) | ||||
| 组态S3 | 0.225*** (3.050) | 3.034*** (2.600) | ||||
| IP | 0.041*** (5.260) | 0.038*** (4.880) | 0.039*** (4.990) | 0.269** (2.150) | 0.228* (1.840) | 0.237* (1.920) |
| UP | -0.023*** (-2.880) | -0.017** (-2.220) | -0.016** (-2.090) | -0.166 (-1.320) | -0.101 (-0.820) | -0.085 (-0.690) |
| GR | 0.202*** (3.170) | 0.178*** (2.800) | 0.167*** (2.600) | -0.865 (-0.850) | -1.155 (-1.130) | -1.336 (-1.310) |
| FC | -0.024** (-2.510) | -0.019** (-2.020) | -0.021** (-2.280) | -0.246 (-1.640) | -0.190 (-1.270) | -0.217 (-1.470) |
| RDI | -0.239*** (-3.140) | -0.206*** (-2.810) | -0.228*** (-3.060) | -0.116 (-0.110) | 0.266 (0.230) | -0.049 (-0.040) |
| 常数项 | 0.056 (1.370) | 0.070* (1.770) | 0.061 (1.540) | 0.612 (0.940) | 0.766 (1.220) | 0.623 (0.990) |
| 观测值 | 94 | 94 | 94 | 94 | 94 | 94 |
| 调整后拟合优度 | 0.342 | 0.353 | 0.352 | 0.048 | 0.059 | 0.074 |
| 因变量:IEO | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型10 | 模型11 | 模型12 | 模型13 | |
| 组态S1 | 0.096* (1.830) | |||
| 组态S2 | 0.193*** (2.660) | |||
| 组态S3 | 0.181** (2.480) | |||
| KRC | 0.028*** (3.350) | 0.023** (2.570) | 0.024*** (2.980) | 0.024*** (2.830) |
| IP | 0.032*** (3.970) | 0.035*** (4.300) | 0.032*** (4.080) | 0.033*** (4.170) |
| UP | -0.017** (-2.180) | -0.020** (-2.530) | -0.015** (-2.060) | -0.015* (-1.960) |
| GR | 0.178*** (2.820) | 0.183*** (2.940) | 0.161*** (2.630) | 0.154** (2.490) |
| FC | -0.018* (-1.930) | -0.020** (-2.180) | -0.016* (-1.810) | -0.018** (-2.030) |
| RDI | -0.177** (-2.440) | -0.215*** (-2.890) | -0.196*** (-2.780) | -0.212*** (-2.950) |
| 常数项 | 0.065* (1.660) | 0.047 (1.180) | 0.051 (1.340) | 0.046 (1.190) |
| 观测值 | 94 | 94 | 94 | 94 |
| 调整后拟合优度 | 0.365 | 0.382 | 0.407 | 0.401 |
Table 8 The effect of collaborative R&D grouping and knowledge recombination creation on the realization of innovative entrepreneurial opportunities
| 因变量:IEO | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型10 | 模型11 | 模型12 | 模型13 | |
| 组态S1 | 0.096* (1.830) | |||
| 组态S2 | 0.193*** (2.660) | |||
| 组态S3 | 0.181** (2.480) | |||
| KRC | 0.028*** (3.350) | 0.023** (2.570) | 0.024*** (2.980) | 0.024*** (2.830) |
| IP | 0.032*** (3.970) | 0.035*** (4.300) | 0.032*** (4.080) | 0.033*** (4.170) |
| UP | -0.017** (-2.180) | -0.020** (-2.530) | -0.015** (-2.060) | -0.015* (-1.960) |
| GR | 0.178*** (2.820) | 0.183*** (2.940) | 0.161*** (2.630) | 0.154** (2.490) |
| FC | -0.018* (-1.930) | -0.020** (-2.180) | -0.016* (-1.810) | -0.018** (-2.030) |
| RDI | -0.177** (-2.440) | -0.215*** (-2.890) | -0.196*** (-2.780) | -0.212*** (-2.950) |
| 常数项 | 0.065* (1.660) | 0.047 (1.180) | 0.051 (1.340) | 0.046 (1.190) |
| 观测值 | 94 | 94 | 94 | 94 |
| 调整后拟合优度 | 0.365 | 0.382 | 0.407 | 0.401 |
| [1] |
Ordeñena X, Vera-Gilces P, Zambrano-Vera J, et al. The effect of high-growth and innovative entrepreneurship on economic growth[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2024, 171: 114243.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
Zhang H J, Hu L Y, Kim Y. How does iteration of entrepreneurial opportunities in user enterprises affect entrepreneurial performance? A dual case study based on dual strategic orientations[J]. Systems, 2023, 11(9): 459.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
Corradini C, Karoglou M. On the persistence and complementarities of design and technological change: A regional perspective[J]. Regional Studies, 2023, 57(7): 1289-1302.
DOI URL |
| [4] |
Arranz N, de Arroyabe J C F. Joint R&D projects as complex systems: A framework of analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2008, 55(4): 552-565.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
Benassi M, Landoni M. State owned enterprises as knowledge explorer agents[J]. Industry and Innovation, 2019, 26(2): 218-241.
DOI |
| [6] | 杜运周, 孙宁, 刘秋辰. 运用混合方法发展和分析复杂中介模型--以营商环境促进创新活力,协同新质生产力和“就业优先”为例[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(6): 217-237. |
| Du Y Z, Sun N, Liu Q C. Developing and analyzing complex mediation models using mixed methods: An illustration of doing business promoting innovation vitality, synergizing new quality productive forces and employment-first[J]. Management World, 2024, 40(6): 217-237. | |
| [7] | Fogg B J. A Behavior Model for Persuasive Design[C]. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, 2009: 1-7. |
| [8] |
Meeker B F. Cooperative orientation, trust, and reciprocity[J]. Human Relations, 1984, 37(3): 225-243.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
Gijsbers G, van Tulder R. New asian challenges: Missing linkages in Asian agricultural innovation and the role of public research organisations in four small- and medium-sized Asian countries[J]. Science Technology and Society, 2011, 16(1): 29-51.
DOI URL |
| [10] |
Mas-Verdú F, Ortiz-Miranda D, García-Alvarez-Coque J M. Examining organizational innovations in different regional settings[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2016, 69(11): 5324-5329.
DOI URL |
| [11] |
Jin Y H, Hu Y H, Pray C, et al. Impact of Government science and technology policies with a focus on biotechnology research on commercial agricultural innovation in China[J]. China Agricultural Economic Review, 2017, 9 (3): 438-452.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
Dias C, Rodrigues R G, Ferreira J J. Small agricultural businesses' performance-what is the role of dynamic capabilities, entrepreneurial orientation, and environmental sustainability commitment?[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2021, 30(4): 1898-1912.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
Ben Amara D, Chen H, Hafeez M. Role of entrepreneurial opportunity identification factors in the eco-innovation of agribusiness[J]. Business Strategy and Development, 2020, 3(4): 435-448.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
Li Z L, Lai X M. Do innovation incentive policies affect China's agricultural patent: Based on the perspective of different R&D subjects[J]. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2024, 15(2): 7237-7256.
DOI |
| [15] |
Foss N J, Lyngsie J, Zahra S A. Organizational design correlates of entrepreneurship: The roles of decentralization and formalization for opportunity discovery and realization[J]. Strategic Organization, 2015, 13(1): 32-60.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
Osei C D, Zhuang J C, Adu D. Impact of regulatory, normative and cognitive institutional pressures on rural agribusiness entrepreneurial opportunities and performance: Empirical evidence from Ghana[J]. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 2024, 27(4): 651-670.
DOI URL |
| [17] |
Pindado E, Sánchez M. Growth-oriented new agricultural ventures: The role of entrepreneurial resources and capabilities under convergence forces[J]. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2019, 46(5): 800-833.
DOI |
| [18] |
Yachin J M, Ioannides D. “Making do” in rural tourism: The resourcing behaviour of tourism micro-firms[J]. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2020, 28(7): 1003-1021.
DOI URL |
| [19] | Jabbouri R, Truong Y, Issa H. The impact of local entrepreneurial initiatives on women entrepreneur empowerment: The case of cooperative social ventures in Morocco[J]. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 2024, 30 (7): 1838-1866. |
| [20] |
Heil S, Bornemann T. Creating shareholder value via collaborative innovation: The role of industry and resource alignment in knowledge exploration[J]. R&D Management, 2018, 48(4): 394-409.
DOI URL |
| [21] |
Fiss P C. Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(2): 393-420.
DOI URL |
| [22] |
Fiorddelise F, Ricci O. Corporate culture and CEO turnover[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2014, 28: 66-82.
DOI URL |
| [23] | 李岩琼, 姚颐. 研发文本信息:真的多说无益吗?--基于分析师预测的文本分析[J]. 会计研究, 2020(2): 26-42. |
| Li Y Q, Yao Y. R&D narrative disclosure: Is talk more really useless?--Textual analysis based on analyst forecast[J]. Accounting Research, 2020(2): 26-42. | |
| [24] |
Dibiaggio L, Nasiriyar M, Nesta L. Substitutability and complementarity of technological knowledge and the inventive performance of semiconductor companies[J]. Research Policy, 2014, 43(9): 1582-1593.
DOI URL |
| [25] |
Carnabuci G, Operti E. Where do firms' recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms' ability to innovate through technological recombination[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2013, 34(13): 1591-1613.
DOI URL |
| [26] |
Young S L, Welter C, Conger M. Stability vs. flexibility: The effect of regulatory institutions on opportunity type[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2018, 49(4): 407-441.
DOI URL |
| [27] |
Su J F, Xu B J, Jiang L X, et al. Cross-organizational knowledge sharing partner selection based on Fogg behavioral model in probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2025, 260: 125348.
DOI URL |
| [28] |
Zhang W, Jiang Y, Zhang W Y. Capabilities for collaborative innovation of technological alliance: A knowledge-based view[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2021, 68(6): 1734-1744.
DOI URL |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||