Abstract: In recent years, the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology has made intellectual property issues the focus of academic research and judicial decisions. This paper reviews the relevant literature and judicial precedents at home and abroad, focusing on the future development of artificial intelligence technology. From the perspective of stimulating innovation, this study has investigated the basic issues such as the subject qualification, object scope, acquisition standards, rights attribution, implementation and application, and effective regulation of intellectual property protection for works, signs and inventions created by artificial intelligence.It constructs a system of intellectual property protection for artificial intelligence and proposes countermeasures for building an intellectual property protection system for AI-generated works, signs, and inventions.The legal policies regarding intellectual property rights of artificial intelligence should be ly revised and improved. It should be clearly stipulated that works, signs and inventions generated by artificial intelligence can obtain intellectual property protection. The ownership of intellectual property rights of artificial intelligence-generated works, signs and inventions should follow the principle of contract. The qualification of artificial intelligence as the creator of works, the designer of signs and the inventor should be granted. The acquisition standards for intellectual property rights of artificial intelligence-generated works, signs and inventions should be improved. The application of the principles of good faith and creditworthiness, balance of interests and anti-abuse regulations of intellectual property rights should be strengthened in the field of artificial intelligence.

摘要： 近年来，人工智能技术迅速发展，知识产权问题成为学术研究和司法裁判的焦点。本文梳理了国内外相关文献和司法判例，面向未来人工智能技术发展，从激励创新的角度，研究了人工智能生成作品、标志与发明创造知识产权保护的主体资格、客体范围、获取标准、权利归属、实施运用、有效规制等基本问题，构建了人工智能知识产权保护制度体系，提出人工智能生成物知识产权保护制度建设对策。应实时修改和完善人工智能知识产权法律政策，明确生成作品、标志与发明可以获得知识产权保护，人工智能生成作品、标志与发明的知识产权归属应遵循合同原则，赋予人工智能本身作品完成者、标志设计者、发明者资格，应完善人工智能生成作品、标志与发明申请知识产权的获取标准，加强人工智能领域知识产权保护诚实信用原则、利益平衡原则、反知识产权滥用规制原则的适用。