• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8): 1687-1701.

• 创新探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

领军企业关键核心技术创新生态演化路径研究

苏禹心,方炜   

  1. 西北工业大学
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-14 修回日期:2024-10-17 出版日期:2025-08-15 发布日期:2025-08-15
  • 通讯作者: 方炜
  • 基金资助:
    新型举国体制下关键核心技术突破的影响机理及实施路径研究

Research on the Evolution Path of Key Core Technology Innovation Ecosystem in Leading Enterprises

  • Received:2024-06-14 Revised:2024-10-17 Online:2025-08-15 Published:2025-08-15

摘要: 科技领军企业推动核心技术产业化、成果化、规模化,深入挖掘其创新生态系统演化路径对明晰关键核心技术攻关的逻辑机理至关重要,国家创新体系的赋能作用也有待探索。文章对迈瑞医疗展开纵向单案例研究,构建了“资源配置情境-创新主体结构-价值主张演变”的分析框架。同时,基于动态能力理论,探究企业创新生态系统与国家创新体系的耦合机制。研究结论:企业在技术攻关中,创新生态系统经历“单一自主生产模式-开放式创新网络-多元主体创新网络-数字创新生态系统”的演化路径;国家自上而下“牵引-驱动-赋能-共创”企业创新生态系统完善,企业自下而上从“识别-整合-重构”的逻辑响应国家创新体系,耦合关键在于“以人民为中心”。研究建议:政策制定应注重发挥科技领军企业的先导能力;国家创新战略和企业创新活动应始终以满足人民需求为出发点和落脚点;企业实现技术成果转化的同时,应关注数据驱动的创新生态建设与技术瓶颈。

Abstract: With economic growth and industrial upgrading, scientific and technological innovation is a key driving force in addressing global challenges and enhancing international competitiveness. Technology leading enterprises promote the transformation of scientific and technological achievements into real productivity, and have become the main force to realize technological breakthroughs and help innovation-driven development. It is not only important to focus on the direct path of enterprises' breakthroughs in key core technologies, but it is even more important to clarify the process of building enterprise innovation ecosystems behind the technological breakthroughs. And the enabling role of the national innovation system in this process needs to be explored. This study is a longitudinal single-case study of a Chinese medical device company, Myriad Medical, and collects primary and secondary data from over 30 years since its establishment. Based on the theories of ecosystem evolution and dynamic capability theory, this study constructs an evolutionary path of corporate innovation ecosystems and explores the evolution and interaction between the national innovation system and corporate innovation ecosystems at different stages. The study will integrate the existing innovation ecosystem related theories and explore the evolution of the innovation ecosystem in the key core technology breakthrough of the leading science and technology enterprises according to the analytical framework of "resource allocation situation - innovation body structure - value proposition change", which enriches the research on innovation ecosystem theory. It enriches the theoretical research on innovation ecosystem. At the same time, it clarifies the enabling role of the national innovation system from the dynamic capability dimension of "identification-integration-reconstruction" of enterprises. In the process of technological breakthroughs, the innovation ecosystem of enterprises has undergone an evolution path of "demand-driven independent production model - open innovation network for technological breakthroughs - multi-agent innovation network for brand building - collaborative innovation ecology with new quality agents for sustainable development". The state enhances the improvement of the enterprise innovation ecosystem through a top-down path of "traction - driving - empowerment - co-creation", while enterprises respond to the national innovation system from the bottom up with a logical process of "identification - integration - reconstruction". The key to this coupling lies in the "people-centered" approach. The study recommends, first, that policy making should increase support for science and technology leading enterprises. The government should support the development of science and technology leading enterprises through policy guidance and resource allocation, enhance their technological innovation and market guidance capabilities, and promote synergistic cooperation among multiple actors. Second, in the construction of the national innovation system, it is necessary to play the role of top-down leadership and emphasize the bottom-up innovation drive of leading enterprises, so as to form a top-down interactive innovation ecology. Third, the national innovation strategy and the innovation activities of enterprises should always pay attention to the needs of the people, focusing on improving the quality of products and services to meet the needs of social development and people's lives. Fourth, while realizing the transformation of technological achievements, leading science and technology enterprises should pay more attention to the construction of a data-driven innovation ecology, so as to enhance the sustainable development capability of the enterprises themselves and the industry.