• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10): 2121-2130.

• 理论与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

预印本文化对缓解科研可重复性危机的作用机制

高进1,黄种兴1,刘聪2   

  1. 1. 东北大学文法学院
    2. 北京航空航天大学
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-18 修回日期:2024-11-03 出版日期:2025-10-15 发布日期:2025-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 黄种兴
  • 基金资助:
    国家仪式与共同体认同研究

The mechanism of preprint culture in alleviating the crisis of scientific research reproducibility

  • Received:2024-09-18 Revised:2024-11-03 Online:2025-10-15 Published:2025-10-15

摘要: 在科研可重复性危机的背景下,预印本文化作为新兴的学术交流范式,正在科研领域迅速扩散并产生深远影响。采用结构方程模型,对761名科研工作者的问卷调查数据进行实证分析,探究预印本文化对缓解科研可重复性危机的作用机制。研究发现:越高水平的预印本文化越能促进科研可重复性增强,有助于纠正科研潜在偏误;科研开放性、科研社会资本在预印本文化与科研可重复性之间起中介作用,即开放科学实践和学术网络构建发挥关键作用;学科文化正向调节预印本文化与科研可重复性之间的关系,学术研究的科学性与严谨性受到不同学科文化影响。研究结论对学界重新思考数字时代科学知识生产及传播本质、促进开放透明的科研评价管理体系构建具有重要意义。

Abstract: Against the background of the scientific research reproducibility crisis, preprint culture, as an emerging paradigm of scholarly communication, is rapidly spreading in the field of scientific research and exerting far-reaching influence. Using structural equation modeling, we conducted an emprical analysis on the questionnaire data of 761 researchers to investigate the mechanism of preprint culture in alleviating the crisis of scientific research reproducibility. The study found that a higher level of preprint culture promotes the enhancement of research reproducibility and helps to correct the potential bias of research; openness and social capital in scientific research play a mediating role between preprint culture and research reproducibility, i.e., the open scientific practice and the construction of academic networks play a key role; the culture of disciplines positively moderates the relationship between preprint culture and research reproducibility, and scientificity and rigor of academic research are affected by the culture of different disciplines. The conclusions of this study are of great significance for academia to rethink the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge in the digital era, and to promote the construction of an open and transparent scientific research evaluation system. In contrast to other studies, our paper primarily presents three theoretical contributions: (1) By integrating the culture of preprints into the framework of research reproducibility, it enriches the theoretical perspective of research reproducibility. Conventional research reproducibility studies predominantly focus on statistical methods and research designs. However, this study investigates the influence of emerging academic communication modalities on research reproducibility, furnishing empirical support and disclosing the specific mechanisms through which the preprint culture enhances research reproducibility by elevating the levels of research openness and research social capital. (2) By combining the culture of preprints with the theories of research reproducibility, open science, and social capital, it expands the theoretical depth and breadth of preprint culture research. Existing studies typically concentrate on the impact of preprints on the efficiency and efficacy of scientific dissemination. Nevertheless, this study systematically explores the role of the preprint culture in enhancing the quality of research. Through constructing and validating a theoretical model of the impact of the preprint culture on research reproducibility, this study offers theoretical support for future policy design. (3) By integrating the theoretical viewpoints of open science and research social capital, it achieves an innovative integration of theories in scientific management. It not only verifies the practical significance of the open science concept and initiatives in enhancing research reproducibility but also extends the theory of knowledge networks and applies it to the studies of preprints and research reproducibility. This theoretical integration provides a more comprehensive perspective for comprehending the production of knowledge and quality control in the modern scientific ecosystem.In addition to the theoretical contributions mentioned above, this paper also provides practical implications, including strengthening the construction and management of preprint platforms, reforming scientific research culture and systems, and implementing discipline-specific strategies.