• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10): 2155-2165.

• 创新探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

择优支持政策能否改善大学科研创新效率———来自“双一流”建设的准自然实验

马浚锋   

  1. 广州大学
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-09 修回日期:2025-01-08 出版日期:2025-10-15 发布日期:2025-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 马浚锋
  • 基金资助:
    教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目:“科技自立自强背景下高校创新体系构建研究”

Can improving the Efficiency of Resource Allocation in Higher Education under Merit-Based Support: A Quasi-Natural Experiment from the "Double First-Class" Initiative

  • Received:2024-09-09 Revised:2025-01-08 Online:2025-10-15 Published:2025-10-15

摘要: 大学科研创新效率表征着高等教育资源配置状况,支撑着高水平科技自立自强的实现,助推教育、科技、人才“三位一体”融合发展。在利用超效率DEA-Malmquist方法测算大学科研创新效率后,以“双一流”建设为准自然实验,采用双重差分方法评估了择优支持式的中国高等教育政策对大学科研创新效率的影响。研究表明,高等教育择优支持政策显著提高了大学科研创新效率,且通过一系列稳健性检验;创新资源再配置和规模经济的空间溢出效应是择优支持式的高等教育政策促进大学科研创新效率提升的重要机制,受支持高校能够借此改善创新资源错配现象,提高人力资本水平。异质性分析发现,如果行政辖区内能够打破人财物等资源要素流动的制度藩篱、地方保护主义,高等教育择优支持政策的创新资源再配置将愈发凸显;即便是在未跨域“中等收入陷阱”的经济发展水平落后地区,或是在人口净流出地区,仍然可以通过高等教育择优支持政策推进资源整合。在实施创新强国战略中,应充分发挥高等教育“龙头”机构的科研创新功能,以一域服务全局,实现以“点”带“面”,提升高水平大学的科研创新效率。

Abstract: The innovation efficiency of university research supports high-level scientific and technological development, and promotes the integrated development of education, science and technology, and talents. After measuring the innovation efficiency of university research using the super-efficient DEA-Malmquist method, the study evaluates the impact of China's higher education policy of merit-based support on the innovation efficiency of university research using the double-difference method in a quasi-natural experiment on the “Double First-Class” initiative. The study shows that the higher education meritocracy policy significantly improves innovation efficiency and passes a series of robustness tests. The reallocation of innovation resources and the spatial spillover effect of economies of scale are the important mechanisms, and the supported universities can improve the mismatch of innovation resources and the level of human capital. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the higher education meritocracy policy will be more and more prominent if we can break down the institutional barriers and local protectionism. Even in regions that have not crossed the "middle-income trap" in terms of economic development or in regions with net population outflows, the integration of resources can still be promoted through merit-based higher education policies. In the future, the scientific research and innovation function of high-level institutions of higher education should be given full play to enhance the innovation efficiency of scientific research.