• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10): 2176-2185.

• 创新探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

创业上行比较对创业机会迭代的差异影响研究

张超1,罗瑾琏2,王象路3,王育铭4,4   

  1. 1. 同济大学经济与管理学院
    2. 同济学经济与管理学院
    3. 同济大学
    4.
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-10 修回日期:2024-11-02 出版日期:2025-10-15 发布日期:2025-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 罗瑾琏
  • 基金资助:
    内化于心何以外显于行:创新使命的多层次意义建构及对企业突破性创新影响效应研究;企业数智化变革中的悖论协同能力建构与效应研究;数字化变革下的团队工作重塑迭代及效应研究

Research on the the differential impact of upward entrepreneurial comparisons on entrepreneurial opportunity iteration

  • Received:2024-09-10 Revised:2024-11-02 Online:2025-10-15 Published:2025-10-15

摘要: 与成功创业者进行比较的现象在创业实践中屡见不鲜,然而其对创业机会迭代会造成怎样的影响这一问题却尚未被解答。本研究基于压力认知评估理论,构建了在一般挑战性和一般阻碍性压力评估情境下,创业上行比较分别通过模仿学习和创业焦虑对创业机会迭代造成差异影响的研究模型。对采集于创业者的248份分时段数据进行分析发现:(1)在创业者对创业上行比较有着高一般挑战性评估时,创业上行比较会对模仿学习起到促进作用,进而加速创业机会迭代;(2)在创业者对创业上行比较有着高一般阻碍性评估时,创业上行比较会对创业焦虑起到促进作用,进而抑制创业机会迭代。本研究探究了创业上行比较对创业机会迭代的差异作用机制,将社会比较扩展至创业情境中,丰富了创业机会迭代的前因研究,同时也为数智时代下创业企业进行创业机会迭代提供了决策依据。

Abstract: In today's rapidly changing market environment, entrepreneurial firms must continuously iterate on their opportunities to respond effectively. However, not all entrepreneurial firms can agilely make these iterations, making it essential to explore how to achieve successful entrepreneurial opportunity iteration. Successful entrepreneurs, as role models, are believed to offer beneficial reference effects for observers, helping them refine and upgrade their entrepreneurial opportunities. Yet, the potential comparative effects of these role models have often been overlooked. Moreover, upward comparisons with successful entrepreneurs can serve as a unique type of pressure source, potentially triggering both challenge and hindrance evaluations among entrepreneurs. These evaluations can influence decisions and actions related to entrepreneurial opportunities in distinct ways. Thus, it is crucial to investigate the mechanisms through which upward comparison affects opportunity iteration, grounded in cognitive appraisal theory of stress. Our study employs a social comparison perspective, based on cognitive appraisal theory of stress, considering two response modes—problem-focused and emotion-focused—entrepreneurs may adopt when faced with upward entrepreneurial comparisons. The model incorporates imitation learning and entrepreneurial anxiety to examine the differential impacts of upward entrepreneurial comparison on entrepreneurial opportunity iteration under contexts of general challenge and hindrance pressure appraisal. To gather data, researchers conducted a survey utilizing both online and offline methods, collecting valid responses from 248 new ventures at three different time points. The analysis revealed two key findings: (1) When entrepreneurs hold a high general challenge appraisal of upward entrepreneurial comparisons, these comparisons enhance imitation learning, thereby accelerating entrepreneurial opportunity iteration; (2) Conversely, when entrepreneurs maintain a high general hindrance appraisal of upward entrepreneurial comparisons, these comparisons increase entrepreneurial anxiety, which inhibits opportunity entrepreneurial iteration. This study contributes to the theoretical landscape in several ways. First, it integrates a social comparison perspective into entrepreneurship research, investigating the effects of upward entrepreneurial comparisons on entrepreneurial opportunity iteration. This not only expands the application of social comparison theory but also enriches the understanding of the antecedents of entrepreneurial opportunity iteration. Second, it constructs mediating pathways of imitation learning and entrepreneurial anxiety based on cognitive appraisal theory of stress, illustrating how upward entrepreneurial comparisons influence entrepreneurial opportunity iteration from both problem-focused and emotional-focused perspectives. This provides a concrete micro-level explanation for the process of entrepreneurial opportunity iteration while broadening the contexts in which cognitive appraisal theory of stress can be applied. Lastly, the research elucidates the different processes through which upward entrepreneurial comparisons can either facilitate or inhibit entrepreneurial opportunity iteration, depending on whether entrepreneurs adopt challenge or hindrance evaluations of upward entrepreneurial comparisons. This insight helps reconcile existing discrepancies in the literature regarding the influence of successful entrepreneurs on observers. The practical implications of this study offer a conceptual framework for new ventures to iterate their entrepreneurial opportunities through a social comparison lens. According to the findings, entrepreneurs who perceive upward entrepreneurial comparisons as a challenge appraisal should actively engage with successful entrepreneurs to learn from their experiences and enhance their own opportunity iterations. Conversely, those with a hindrance appraisal should limit comparisons with successful entrepreneurs. Additionally, entrepreneurs are encouraged to participate in imitation learning while consciously monitoring and regulating their anxiety levels. Furthermore, entrepreneurial incubation institutions and regional management committees should provide resources and training to bolster entrepreneurs' confidence and efficacy, thereby fostering a challenge-oriented mindset in response to upward comparisons.