• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1229-1240.

• 理论与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

企业数字化创新能力:内涵、测度与影响

曲冠楠1,2, 接园3, 王璐瑶4(), 阮顺芳2   

  1. 1 北京理工大学管理学院, 北京 100081
    2 北京理工大学国际组织创新学院, 北京 100081
    3 中共江苏省委党校公共管理教研部, 江苏南京 210009
    4 中国传媒大学经济与管理学院, 北京 100024
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-16 修回日期:2025-06-04 出版日期:2026-06-15 发布日期:2026-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 王璐瑶(1991-),女,副教授,博士, E-mail: wangluyao@cuc.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:曲冠楠(1986-),男,特别研究员,副教授,博士。
    接园(1989-),女,讲师,博士。
    阮顺芳(2003-),女,本科生。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年项目(72302223);国家自然科学基金面上项目(72374189);北京市社会科学基金决策咨询重点项目(24JCB018)

Digitalized innovation capabilities: Concepts, measurement, and performance

QU Guan-nan1,2, JIE Yuan3, WANG Lu-yao4(), RUAN Shun-fang2   

  1. 1 School of Management, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
    2 School of Global Governance, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
    3 Public Administration Teaching and Research Department, Party School of the Jiangsu Provincial Committee of the CPC, Nanjing 210009, China
    4 School of Economics and Management, Communication University of China, Beijing 100024, China
  • Received:2025-04-16 Revised:2025-06-04 Online:2026-06-15 Published:2026-06-15

摘要:

新时代,数字化创新能力(Digitalized Innovation Capabilities, DICs)作为赋能企业可持续竞争优势的核心,已成为创新管理研究与企业创新实践的重要关切。然而,尽管主流研究对数字创新的相关概念、内涵、边界与影响的探索已渐深入,但关于企业数字化创新能力(DICs)的清晰界定、严谨测度与可靠实证仍然缺乏,致使关于其前因与产出的系统分析面临挑战。基于文献采集,研究对数字化创新能力的理论基础进行系统回顾,将其定义为企业通过对数字技术的开发和利用来赋能自身创新过程的能力,涵盖数字开放性创新能力(O-DICs)、数字可供性创新能力(A-DICs)和数字自生长性创新能力(G-DICs)3个子维度。继而,基于访谈调研与问卷调查,运用探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析方法,实施企业数字化创新能力量表(DICs Scale)的开发与信效度检验,并进一步验证数字化创新能力的不同维度对企业创新绩效的影响。

关键词: 数字化创新能力, 数字创新, 创新能力, 量表开发

Abstract:

In the rapidly evolving digital economy, Digitalized Innovation Capabilities (DICs) have emerged as a pivotal enabler of sustainable competitive advantage for enterprises, fundamentally reshaping innovation management paradigms. Despite growing scholarly attention to digital innovation concepts, boundaries, and impacts, a significant theoretical and empirical gap persists regarding the precise definition, rigorous measurement, and systematic validation of DICs. This limitation impedes a holistic understanding of their antecedents and outcomes, hindering both academic discourse and practical implementation. To address this critical gap, this study synthesizes insights from Resource-Based View (RBV) and Dynamic Capabilities (DCs) logic to reconceptualize DICs as a firm’s capabilities to empower its innovation processes through the development and application of digital technologies. This integrative framework transcends conventional RBV’s static resource focus and DCs’ process-oriented limitations. Through systematic literature analysis and empirical validation, we deconstruct DICs into three interdependent dimensions: Openness Digitalized Innovation Capabilities (O-DICs), which enhance the depth, breadth, and efficiency of information exchange, expand channels for acquiring external resources, improve organizational learning, and ultimately increase market acceptance of innovations through digital technology development and application. This transcends traditional Open Innovation (OI) by enabling broader participation, deeper insights, and faster knowledge flows; Affordance Digitalized Innovation Capabilities (A-DICs), leveraging digital technologies to provide diverse possibilities and functional support for innovation activities across different contexts. Rooted in the concept of affordances, A-DICs help firms overcome barriers arising from bounded rationality, cognitive diversity, institutional differences, and cultural diversity. They enable context-sensitive adaptation, enhance innovation legitimacy, and expand innovation boundaries by facilitating resource integration across physical and cyber spaces, cross-industry collaboration, and scenario-specific application of technologies; Generativity Digitalized Innovation Capabilities (G-DICs), utilizing digital technologies to stimulate spontaneous, diverse, and unpredictable positive changes within the innovation process, driving it towards greater efficiency and sustainability. Capitalizing on inherent digital generativity, G-DICs foster emergent innovation, accelerate the iteration and diffusion of innovative outputs, and expand the value network by enabling diverse actor participation and collaboration. Methodologically, this research employs a mixed-methods approach to develop and validate the DICs Scale. Initial constructs derived from semi-structured interviews with industry experts and managers underwent exploratory factor analysis(EFA), yielding are fined item pool. Subsequent confirmatory factor analysis(CFA) with large-scale survey data confirmed the scale’s robustness, demonstrating high reliability, and discriminant validity across manufacturing and service sectors. Regression analyses further established that all three DICs dimensions exert statistically significant positive effects on innovation performance. This research makes significant theoretical contributions. It systematically defines the theoretical connotation of DICs and proposes a novel three-dimensional framework (O-DICs, A-DICs, G-DICs), moving beyond the limitations of the DCs framework in explaining how digital technologies empower the innovation process and revealing the micro-foundations of innovation capabilities in the digital context. Crucially, it develops and rigorously validates the DICs Scale, providing a scientifically reliable and effective measurement tool to empirically assess DICs, addressing a critical gap in the field. Furthermore, it empirically verifies the significant positive impact of DICs on innovation performance, offering clear guidance for managers seeking to enhance innovation outcomes and formulate digital innovation strategies. Notwithstanding these contributions, limitations include reliance on cross-sectional data and sectoral concentration. Future research should pursue longitudinal designs to track capability evolution and examine sector-specific moderators.

Key words: digitalized innovation capabilities, digital innovation, innovation capabilities, scale development

中图分类号: