• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1229-1240.

• 理论与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

企业数字化创新能力:内涵、测度与影响

曲冠楠1,接园2,王璐瑶3,阮顺芳1   

  1. 1. 北京理工大学 管理学院
    2. 中共江苏省委党校 公共管理教研部
    3. 中国传媒大学经济与管理学院
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-16 修回日期:2025-06-05 出版日期:2026-06-15 发布日期:2026-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 王璐瑶

Digitalized Innovation Capabilities: Conceptual Dimensions, Measurement, and Performance

  • Received:2025-04-16 Revised:2025-06-05 Online:2026-06-15 Published:2026-06-15

摘要: 新时代,数字化创新能力(Digitalized Innovation Capabilities, DICs)作为赋能企业可持续竞争优势的核心,已成为创新管理研究与企业创新实践的重要关切。然而,尽管主流研究对数字创新的相关概念、内涵、边界与影响的探索已渐深入,但关于企业数字化创新能力(DICs)的清晰界定、严谨测度与可靠实证仍然缺乏,致使关于其前因与产出的系统分析面临挑战。基于文献采集,研究对数字化创新能力的理论基础进行系统回顾,将其定义为企业通过对数字技术的开发和利用来赋能自身创新过程的能力,涵盖数字开放性创新能力(O-DICs)、数字可供性创新能力(A-DICs)和数字自生长性创新能力(G-DICs)三个子维度。继而,基于访谈调研与问卷调查,运用探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析方法,实施企业数字化创新能力量表(DICs Scale)的开发与信效度检验并进一步验证数字化创新能力的不同维度对企业创新绩效的影响。

Abstract: Digitalized Innovation Capabilities (DICs), as a core enabler of firms’ sustainable competitive advantage, have become a central concern in both innovation management research and practice. Although mainstream studies have increasingly explored related concepts, connotations, boundaries, and impacts of digital innovation, there remains a lack of clear definition, rigorous measurement, and reliable empirical evidence regarding DICs. This gap poses challenges to the systematic analysis of their antecedents and outcomes. Based on an extensive literature review, this study systematically reviews the theoretical foundations of DICs and defines it as a firm’s capabilities to empower its innovation processes through the development and application of digital technologies. DICs are conceptualized to include three sub-dimensions: Openness Digitalized Innovation Capabilities (O-DICs), Affordance Digitalized Innovation Capabilities (A-DICs), and Generativity Digitalized Innovation Capabilities (G-DICs). Furthermore, drawing on interviews and survey data, the study develops a DICs measurement scale using EFA and CFA, and examines the reliability and validity of the scale. The results further verify the distinct effects of different DICs dimensions on firms’ innovation performance.