科学学研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1154-1168.
收稿日期:2025-04-03
修回日期:2025-07-29
出版日期:2026-06-15
发布日期:2026-06-15
通讯作者:
谢文彬(2001-),男,博士研究生, E-mail:作者简介:单伟(1978-),男,教授、博士生导师。基金资助:
SHAN Wei1,2, XIE Wen-bin1(
), SUN Yi-zhong1, CHENG Chang-feng1
Received:2025-04-03
Revised:2025-07-29
Online:2026-06-15
Published:2026-06-15
摘要:
作为我国战略性新兴产业,低空经济正成为培育新质生产力的关键领域。基于TOE框架,通过建立整合QCA与回归分析的复杂中介模型,系统探究低空经济领域企业突破式创新的驱动路径及其对高质量发展的作用机制。研究发现:(1)突破式创新能力的形成遵循多重并发因果逻辑,不存在单一必要条件;(2)企业创新存在研发驱动型、数字驱动型、环境驱动型、协同驱动型及创新试错型5类驱动范式;(3)复杂中介检验表明,除创新试错型外,其余4类范式基本均可通过赋能突破式创新能力,进而促进企业高质量发展。研究结果填补了低空经济微观机制的理论空白,并为企业优化创新战略和政府构建产业生态提供决策依据。
中图分类号:
单伟, 谢文彬, 孙一中, 程长风. 低空经济企业突破式创新与高质量发展[J]. 科学学研究, 2026, 44(6): 1154-1168.
SHAN Wei, XIE Wen-bin, SUN Yi-zhong, CHENG Chang-feng. The breakthrough innovation and high-quality development of enterprises in low-altitude economy field[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2026, 44(6): 1154-1168.
| 定量研究 | 现有研究较少,主要涵盖区域测度[ | 本文研究,旨在揭示低空经济领域企业创新模式与发展路径。 |
| 定性研究 | 现有研究较多,主要涵盖创新政策[ | 现有研究较少,主要涵盖产品创新与场景创新[ |
| 政府层面 | 企业层面 |
表1 低空经济领域文献分析
Table 1 Literature analysis in the low-altitude economy
| 定量研究 | 现有研究较少,主要涵盖区域测度[ | 本文研究,旨在揭示低空经济领域企业创新模式与发展路径。 |
| 定性研究 | 现有研究较多,主要涵盖创新政策[ | 现有研究较少,主要涵盖产品创新与场景创新[ |
| 政府层面 | 企业层面 |
| 变量类型 | 变量名称 | 校准锚点 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 完全隶属 | 交叉点 | 完全不隶属 | ||
| 结果变量 | 突破式创新能力 | 3.714 | 2.833 | 1.792 |
| 条件变量 | 技术多元化 | 0.887 | 0.794 | 0.643 |
| 研发能力 | 32.510 | 18.850 | 12.865 | |
| 知识吸收能力 | 11.325 | 6.510 | 4.370 | |
| 数字化水平 | 3.784 | 2.639 | 1.386 | |
| 组织冗余 | 0.177 | 0.108 | 0.066 | |
| 基础设施 | 41.000 | 16.000 | 11.000 | |
| 营商环境 | 68.250 | 65.930 | 60.830 | |
表2 结果变量与条件变量校准锚点
Table 2 Information of results and conditions calibration
| 变量类型 | 变量名称 | 校准锚点 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 完全隶属 | 交叉点 | 完全不隶属 | ||
| 结果变量 | 突破式创新能力 | 3.714 | 2.833 | 1.792 |
| 条件变量 | 技术多元化 | 0.887 | 0.794 | 0.643 |
| 研发能力 | 32.510 | 18.850 | 12.865 | |
| 知识吸收能力 | 11.325 | 6.510 | 4.370 | |
| 数字化水平 | 3.784 | 2.639 | 1.386 | |
| 组织冗余 | 0.177 | 0.108 | 0.066 | |
| 基础设施 | 41.000 | 16.000 | 11.000 | |
| 营商环境 | 68.250 | 65.930 | 60.830 | |
| 前因条件 | 高突破式创新能力 | |
|---|---|---|
| 一致性 | 覆盖度 | |
| 技术多元化 | 0.751 | 0.712 |
| 非技术多元化 | 0.346 | 0.356 |
| 研发能力 | 0.584 | 0.596 |
| 非研发能力 | 0.500 | 0.477 |
| 知识吸收能力 | 0.574 | 0.584 |
| 非知识吸收能力 | 0.519 | 0.496 |
| 数字化水平 | 0.592 | 0.584 |
| 非数字化水平 | 0.499 | 0.492 |
| 组织冗余 | 0.521 | 0.525 |
| 非组织冗余 | 0.565 | 0.546 |
| 基础设施 | 0.472 | 0.522 |
| 非基础设施 | 0.624 | 0.556 |
| 营商环境 | 0.448 | 0.505 |
| 非营商环境 | 0.653 | 0.572 |
表3 必要条件分析结果
Table 3 Results of analysis of necessary conditions
| 前因条件 | 高突破式创新能力 | |
|---|---|---|
| 一致性 | 覆盖度 | |
| 技术多元化 | 0.751 | 0.712 |
| 非技术多元化 | 0.346 | 0.356 |
| 研发能力 | 0.584 | 0.596 |
| 非研发能力 | 0.500 | 0.477 |
| 知识吸收能力 | 0.574 | 0.584 |
| 非知识吸收能力 | 0.519 | 0.496 |
| 数字化水平 | 0.592 | 0.584 |
| 非数字化水平 | 0.499 | 0.492 |
| 组织冗余 | 0.521 | 0.525 |
| 非组织冗余 | 0.565 | 0.546 |
| 基础设施 | 0.472 | 0.522 |
| 非基础设施 | 0.624 | 0.556 |
| 营商环境 | 0.448 | 0.505 |
| 非营商环境 | 0.653 | 0.572 |
| 前因条件 | 高突破式创新能力 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | S2 | S3a | S3b | S4a | S4b | S5 | |
| 技术多元化 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| 研发能力 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| 知识吸收能力 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||
| 数字化水平 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| 组织冗余 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| 基础设施 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| 营商环境 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| 一致性 | 0.868 | 0.817 | 0.814 | 0.828 | 0.909 | 0.833 | 0.884 |
| 原始覆盖度 | 0.085 | 0.064 | 0.138 | 0.115 | 0.083 | 0.112 | 0.052 |
| 唯一覆盖度 | 0.033 | 0.020 | 0.023 | 0.007 | 0.009 | 0.039 | 0.018 |
| 总体一致性 | 0.822 | ||||||
| 总体覆盖度 | 0.336 | ||||||
表4 组态分析结果
Table 4 Results of configuration analysis
| 前因条件 | 高突破式创新能力 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | S2 | S3a | S3b | S4a | S4b | S5 | |
| 技术多元化 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| 研发能力 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| 知识吸收能力 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||
| 数字化水平 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| 组织冗余 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| 基础设施 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| 营商环境 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| 一致性 | 0.868 | 0.817 | 0.814 | 0.828 | 0.909 | 0.833 | 0.884 |
| 原始覆盖度 | 0.085 | 0.064 | 0.138 | 0.115 | 0.083 | 0.112 | 0.052 |
| 唯一覆盖度 | 0.033 | 0.020 | 0.023 | 0.007 | 0.009 | 0.039 | 0.018 |
| 总体一致性 | 0.822 | ||||||
| 总体覆盖度 | 0.336 | ||||||
| 前因条件 | 高突破式创新能力 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 提高案例阈值至3 | 校准90,50,10 | |||||||||||||
| S1a | S1b | S2 | S3 | S4 | S1 | S2 | ||||||||
| 技术多元化 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| 研发能力 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| 知识吸收能力 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||
| 数字化水平 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| 组织冗余 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||
| 基础设施 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| 营商环境 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| 一致性 | 0.909 | 0.833 | 0.817 | 0.850 | 0.820 | 0.900 | 0.914 | |||||||
| 原始覆盖度 | 0.083 | 0.112 | 0.064 | 0.056 | 0.107 | 0.157 | 0.208 | |||||||
| 唯一覆盖度 | 0.010 | 0.042 | 0.032 | 0.021 | 0.075 | 0.072 | 0.122 | |||||||
| 总体一致性 | 0.814 | 0.900 | ||||||||||||
| 总体覆盖度 | 0.271 | 0.279 | ||||||||||||
表5 组态分析稳健性检验
Table 5 Robustness tests for configuration analysis
| 前因条件 | 高突破式创新能力 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 提高案例阈值至3 | 校准90,50,10 | |||||||||||||
| S1a | S1b | S2 | S3 | S4 | S1 | S2 | ||||||||
| 技术多元化 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| 研发能力 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| 知识吸收能力 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||
| 数字化水平 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| 组织冗余 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||
| 基础设施 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| 营商环境 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| 一致性 | 0.909 | 0.833 | 0.817 | 0.850 | 0.820 | 0.900 | 0.914 | |||||||
| 原始覆盖度 | 0.083 | 0.112 | 0.064 | 0.056 | 0.107 | 0.157 | 0.208 | |||||||
| 唯一覆盖度 | 0.010 | 0.042 | 0.032 | 0.021 | 0.075 | 0.072 | 0.122 | |||||||
| 总体一致性 | 0.814 | 0.900 | ||||||||||||
| 总体覆盖度 | 0.271 | 0.279 | ||||||||||||
| 变量类型 | 变量名称 | 平均值 | 标准差 | 最小值 | 最大值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 被解释变量 | 高质量发展TFP | 6.807 | 0.829 | 5.095 | 10.196 |
| 解释变量 | 组态S1 | 0.048 | 0.117 | 0.000 | 0.840 |
| 组态S2 | 0.039 | 0.100 | 0.000 | 0.850 | |
| 组态S3a | 0.083 | 0.187 | 0.000 | 0.940 | |
| 组态S3b | 0.068 | 0.163 | 0.000 | 0.770 | |
| 组态S4a | 0.045 | 0.111 | 0.000 | 0.501 | |
| 组态S4b | 0.066 | 0.151 | 0.000 | 0.770 | |
| 组态S5 | 0.029 | 0.068 | 0.000 | 0.580 | |
| 中介变量 | 突破式创新能力Inn | 2.833 | 1.455 | 0.000 | 8.256 |
| 控制变量 | 两职合一Dual | 0.365 | 0.482 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
| 资产负债率Lev | 0.435 | 0.195 | 0.060 | 0.992 | |
| 企业规模Size | 7.900 | 1.243 | 5.170 | 11.939 | |
| 企业年龄Age | 3.121 | 0.279 | 2.079 | 3.738 |
表6 描述性统计
Table 6 Descriptive statistics
| 变量类型 | 变量名称 | 平均值 | 标准差 | 最小值 | 最大值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 被解释变量 | 高质量发展TFP | 6.807 | 0.829 | 5.095 | 10.196 |
| 解释变量 | 组态S1 | 0.048 | 0.117 | 0.000 | 0.840 |
| 组态S2 | 0.039 | 0.100 | 0.000 | 0.850 | |
| 组态S3a | 0.083 | 0.187 | 0.000 | 0.940 | |
| 组态S3b | 0.068 | 0.163 | 0.000 | 0.770 | |
| 组态S4a | 0.045 | 0.111 | 0.000 | 0.501 | |
| 组态S4b | 0.066 | 0.151 | 0.000 | 0.770 | |
| 组态S5 | 0.029 | 0.068 | 0.000 | 0.580 | |
| 中介变量 | 突破式创新能力Inn | 2.833 | 1.455 | 0.000 | 8.256 |
| 控制变量 | 两职合一Dual | 0.365 | 0.482 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
| 资产负债率Lev | 0.435 | 0.195 | 0.060 | 0.992 | |
| 企业规模Size | 7.900 | 1.243 | 5.170 | 11.939 | |
| 企业年龄Age | 3.121 | 0.279 | 2.079 | 3.738 |
| 因变量:高质量发展TFP | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | |
| S1 | 0.896*** | ||||||
| (0.253) | |||||||
| S2 | 0.796** | ||||||
| (0.309) | |||||||
| S3a | 0.454** | ||||||
| (0.197) | |||||||
| S3b | 0.415* | ||||||
| (0.248) | |||||||
| S4a | 0.728** | ||||||
| (0.309) | |||||||
| S4b | 0.147 | ||||||
| (0.206) | |||||||
| S5 | -0.216 | ||||||
| (0.438) | |||||||
| Dual | 0.069 | 0.062 | 0.050 | 0.050 | 0.022 | 0.043 | 0.046 |
| (0.085) | (0.086) | (0.086) | (0.086) | (0.088) | (0.087) | (0.085) | |
| Lev | 0.954*** | 0.954*** | 0.899*** | 0.918*** | 0.924*** | 0.937*** | 0.945*** |
| (0.290) | (0.292) | (0.294) | (0.291) | (0.295) | (0.294) | (0.297) | |
| Size | 0.298*** | 0.293*** | 0.295*** | 0.298*** | 0.301*** | 0.307*** | 0.305*** |
| (0.037) | (0.037) | (0.037) | (0.037) | (0.037) | (0.037) | (0.038) | |
| Age | 0.063 | 0.049 | 0.035 | 0.049 | 0.058 | 0.072 | 0.073 |
| (0.197) | (0.199) | (0.203) | (0.200) | (0.199) | (0.200) | (0.199) | |
| Constant | 3.756*** | 3.855*** | 3.900*** | 3.834*** | 3.789*** | 3.703*** | 3.726*** |
| (0.634) | (0.647) | (0.663) | (0.652) | (0.646) | (0.648) | (0.644) | |
| N | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 |
| adj. R2 | 0.383 | 0.376 | 0.377 | 0.373 | 0.376 | 0.367 | 0.366 |
表7 基准回归
Table 7 Benchmark regression
| 因变量:高质量发展TFP | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | |
| S1 | 0.896*** | ||||||
| (0.253) | |||||||
| S2 | 0.796** | ||||||
| (0.309) | |||||||
| S3a | 0.454** | ||||||
| (0.197) | |||||||
| S3b | 0.415* | ||||||
| (0.248) | |||||||
| S4a | 0.728** | ||||||
| (0.309) | |||||||
| S4b | 0.147 | ||||||
| (0.206) | |||||||
| S5 | -0.216 | ||||||
| (0.438) | |||||||
| Dual | 0.069 | 0.062 | 0.050 | 0.050 | 0.022 | 0.043 | 0.046 |
| (0.085) | (0.086) | (0.086) | (0.086) | (0.088) | (0.087) | (0.085) | |
| Lev | 0.954*** | 0.954*** | 0.899*** | 0.918*** | 0.924*** | 0.937*** | 0.945*** |
| (0.290) | (0.292) | (0.294) | (0.291) | (0.295) | (0.294) | (0.297) | |
| Size | 0.298*** | 0.293*** | 0.295*** | 0.298*** | 0.301*** | 0.307*** | 0.305*** |
| (0.037) | (0.037) | (0.037) | (0.037) | (0.037) | (0.037) | (0.038) | |
| Age | 0.063 | 0.049 | 0.035 | 0.049 | 0.058 | 0.072 | 0.073 |
| (0.197) | (0.199) | (0.203) | (0.200) | (0.199) | (0.200) | (0.199) | |
| Constant | 3.756*** | 3.855*** | 3.900*** | 3.834*** | 3.789*** | 3.703*** | 3.726*** |
| (0.634) | (0.647) | (0.663) | (0.652) | (0.646) | (0.648) | (0.644) | |
| N | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 |
| adj. R2 | 0.383 | 0.376 | 0.377 | 0.373 | 0.376 | 0.367 | 0.366 |
| 稳健性检验1:替换因变量TFP_LP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | ||||||||
| S1 | 0.787*** | |||||||||||||
| (0.242) | ||||||||||||||
| S2 | 0.715** | |||||||||||||
| (0.289) | ||||||||||||||
| S3a | 0.346* | |||||||||||||
| (0.197) | ||||||||||||||
| S3b | 0.277 | |||||||||||||
| (0.249) | ||||||||||||||
| S4a | 0.831*** | |||||||||||||
| (0.316) | ||||||||||||||
| S4b | 0.217 | |||||||||||||
| (0.210) | ||||||||||||||
| S5 | -0.232 | |||||||||||||
| (0.422) | ||||||||||||||
| CVs | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||
| N | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | |||||||
| adj. R2 | 0.622 | 0.619 | 0.618 | 0.616 | 0.622 | 0.615 | 0.614 | |||||||
表8 稳健性检验1:替换因变量
Table 8 Robustness test 1: replacing the dependent variable
| 稳健性检验1:替换因变量TFP_LP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | ||||||||
| S1 | 0.787*** | |||||||||||||
| (0.242) | ||||||||||||||
| S2 | 0.715** | |||||||||||||
| (0.289) | ||||||||||||||
| S3a | 0.346* | |||||||||||||
| (0.197) | ||||||||||||||
| S3b | 0.277 | |||||||||||||
| (0.249) | ||||||||||||||
| S4a | 0.831*** | |||||||||||||
| (0.316) | ||||||||||||||
| S4b | 0.217 | |||||||||||||
| (0.210) | ||||||||||||||
| S5 | -0.232 | |||||||||||||
| (0.422) | ||||||||||||||
| CVs | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||
| N | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | |||||||
| adj. R2 | 0.622 | 0.619 | 0.618 | 0.616 | 0.622 | 0.615 | 0.614 | |||||||
| 稳健性检验2:去除极端值 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | |
| S1 | 0.961*** | ||||||
| (0.282) | |||||||
| S2 | 0.876** | ||||||
| (0.356) | |||||||
| S3a | 0.478** | ||||||
| (0.192) | |||||||
| S3b | 0.434* | ||||||
| (0.244) | |||||||
| S4a | 0.757** | ||||||
| (0.301) | |||||||
| S4b | 0.167 | ||||||
| (0.209) | |||||||
| S5 | -0.115 | ||||||
| (0.496) | |||||||
| CVs | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| N | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 |
| adj. R2 | 0.393 | 0.385 | 0.387 | 0.383 | 0.386 | 0.376 | 0.375 |
表9 稳健性检验2:去除极端值
Table 9 Robustness test 2: removing extreme values
| 稳健性检验2:去除极端值 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | |
| S1 | 0.961*** | ||||||
| (0.282) | |||||||
| S2 | 0.876** | ||||||
| (0.356) | |||||||
| S3a | 0.478** | ||||||
| (0.192) | |||||||
| S3b | 0.434* | ||||||
| (0.244) | |||||||
| S4a | 0.757** | ||||||
| (0.301) | |||||||
| S4b | 0.167 | ||||||
| (0.209) | |||||||
| S5 | -0.115 | ||||||
| (0.496) | |||||||
| CVs | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| N | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 |
| adj. R2 | 0.393 | 0.385 | 0.387 | 0.383 | 0.386 | 0.376 | 0.375 |
| 因变量:高质量发展TFP | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
| S1 | 0.691*** | |||||||
| (0.252) | ||||||||
| S2 | 0.707** | |||||||
| (0.276) | ||||||||
| S3a | 0.475** | |||||||
| (0.200) | ||||||||
| S3b | 0.444* | |||||||
| (0.259) | ||||||||
| S4a | 0.515* | |||||||
| (0.301) | ||||||||
| S4b | -0.056 | |||||||
| (0.201) | ||||||||
| S5 | -0.550 | |||||||
| (0.415) | ||||||||
| Inn | 0.092*** | 0.077** | 0.088*** | 0.094*** | 0.094*** | 0.083** | 0.094*** | 0.097*** |
| (0.033) | (0.034) | (0.033) | (0.033) | (0.033) | (0.034) | (0.035) | (0.035) | |
| CVs | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| N | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 |
| adj. R2 | 0.388 | 0.396 | 0.393 | 0.398 | 0.394 | 0.391 | 0.386 | 0.388 |
表10 中介分析
Table 10 Intermediary analysis
| 因变量:高质量发展TFP | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
| S1 | 0.691*** | |||||||
| (0.252) | ||||||||
| S2 | 0.707** | |||||||
| (0.276) | ||||||||
| S3a | 0.475** | |||||||
| (0.200) | ||||||||
| S3b | 0.444* | |||||||
| (0.259) | ||||||||
| S4a | 0.515* | |||||||
| (0.301) | ||||||||
| S4b | -0.056 | |||||||
| (0.201) | ||||||||
| S5 | -0.550 | |||||||
| (0.415) | ||||||||
| Inn | 0.092*** | 0.077** | 0.088*** | 0.094*** | 0.094*** | 0.083** | 0.094*** | 0.097*** |
| (0.033) | (0.034) | (0.033) | (0.033) | (0.033) | (0.034) | (0.035) | (0.035) | |
| CVs | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| N | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 |
| adj. R2 | 0.388 | 0.396 | 0.393 | 0.398 | 0.394 | 0.391 | 0.386 | 0.388 |
| [1] | 勇担时代重任加快建设科技强国[N]. 人民日报, 2024-07-31(9). |
| Shouldering the historical responsibility to accelerate the building of a world leader in science and technology[N]. People's Daily, 2024-07-31(9). | |
| [2] | 欧阳桃花. 低空经济的技术创新与场景创新[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2024(15): 57-68. |
| Ouyang T H. Technological innovation and scenario innovation of Low-altitude economy[J]. Frontiers, 2024(15): 57-68. | |
| [3] | 沈映春, 赵雨涵, 周昕怡. 低空经济现代化产业体系建设的逻辑框架与战略路径[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2025(2): 104-112. |
| Shen Y C, Zhao Y H, Zhou X Y. The logical framework and strategic pathways for constructing a modern industrial system for the Low-altitude economy[J]. Jiangsu Social Sciences, 2025(2): 104-112. | |
| [4] | 薛领, 孙欣彤, 潘苏. 我国低空经济的基础支撑、关键领域与发展重点[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2025(2): 120-129. |
| Xue L, Sun X T, Pan S. The foundation support, key areas, and development priorities for China's low-altitude economy[J]. Social Science Journal, 2025(2): 120-129. | |
| [5] | 刘松林, 张虹, 杨青龙, 等. 低空经济现代化水平的统计测度与时空特征[J]. 统计与决策, 2025(5): 109-115. |
| Liu S L, Zhang H, Yang Q L, et al. Statistical measurement and spatiotemporal characteristics of low-altitude economic modernization level[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2025(5): 109-115. | |
| [6] | 吕人力. 低空经济的背景、内涵与全球格局[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2024(15): 45-56. |
| Lyu R L. The background, connotation and global pattern of low-altitude economy[J]. Frontiers, 2024(15): 45-56. | |
| [7] | 王庆. 低空经济发展:新兴安全风险与敏捷治理[J]. 科学学研究, 2025, 43(8): 1569-1578. |
| Wang Q. Low-altitude economy development: Emerging safety risks and agile governance[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2025, 43(8): 1569-1578. | |
| [8] | 沈映春, 张豪兴. 数字基础设施建设对低空经济高质量发展的影响研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 37(5): 96-108. |
| Shen Y C, Zhang H X. Impact of digital infrastructure construction on the high-quality development of Low-altitude economy[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 37(5): 96-108. | |
| [9] | 张峰, 刘曦苑, 武立东, 等. 产品创新还是服务转型:经济政策不确定性与制造业创新选择[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(7): 101-118. |
| Zhang F, Liu X Y, Wu L D, et al. Product innovation or service transition: Economic policy uncertainty and manufacturing innovation choice[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2019(7): 101-118. | |
| [10] | 夏清华, 朱清. “专精特新”企业突破式创新的组态分析与范式选择[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2023, 45(10): 20-34. |
| Xia Q H, Zhu Q. Configuration analysis and paradigm selection of 'SRDI' enterprises' radical innovation[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2023, 45(10): 20-34. | |
| [11] | 陈静, 曾德明, 欧阳晓平. 知识重组能力与高新技术企业绩效——冗余资源与创新开放度的调节效应分析[J]. 管理工程学报, 2021, 35(3): 23-33. |
| Chen J, Zeng D M, Ouyang X P. Knowledge recombination capability and high-tech firm performance: The contingent role of slack resources and innovation openness[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2021, 35(3): 23-33. | |
| [12] |
Fleming L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search[J]. Management Science, 2001, 47(1): 117-132.
DOI URL |
| [13] | 张庆垒, 施建军, 刘春林, 等. 技术多元化、行业竞争互动与双元创新能力[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2018, 40(9): 71-83. |
| Zhang Q L, Shi J J, Liu C L, et al. Technological diversification, industrial competitive interaction and ambidextrous innovative competences[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2018, 40(9): 71-83. | |
| [14] | 曾萍, 汪金爱, 吕迪伟. 中国民营企业核心能力与多元化战略选择研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(3): 89-98. |
| Zeng P, Wang J A, Lyu D W. A study of core competences and diversification strategies of Chinese private enterprises[J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(3): 89-98. | |
| [15] | 温兴琦, 孙凯新, 李诗瑶. 产学研合作、知识吸收能力与企业创新绩效——高管学术背景与政府创新补贴的调节作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(15): 55-64. |
| Wen X Q, Sun K X, Li S Y. Industry-university-research collaboration, knowledge absorption capacity and enterprise innovation performance: The moderating effect of executives' academic background and government innovation subsidies[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2024, 41(15): 55-64. | |
| [16] | 吴非, 胡慧芷, 林慧妍, 等. 企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(7): 130-144, 10. |
| Wu F, Hu H Z, Lin H Y, et al. Enterprise digital transformation and capital market performance: Empirical evidence from stock liquidity[J]. Journal of Management World, 2021, 37(7): 130-144, 10. | |
| [17] | 韩炜, 刘夏青. 重复性联盟组合重构对焦点企业绩效的影响研究[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2024, 36(1): 94-107. |
| Han W, Liu X Q. Effect of repeated alliance portfolio reconfiguration on focused firms' performance[J]. R&D Management, 2024, 36(1): 94-107. | |
| [18] | 张杰, 郑姣姣. 公路基础设施如何重塑中国创新格局——基于地域异质性的微观证据[J]. 金融研究, 2023(10): 66-84. |
| Zhang J, Zheng J J. Roads and innovation: New evidence from Chinese firms —Micro evidence based on regional heterogeneity[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2023(10): 66-84. | |
| [19] | 杨博旭, 柳卸林, 王宁. 区域创新效能的提升路径研究:功能观视角[J]. 科学学研究, 2025, 43(3): 560-570, 672. |
| Yang B X, Liu X L, Wang N. Research on the promotion path of regional innovation efficiency: From the perspective of functional view[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2025, 43(3): 560-570, 672. | |
| [20] | 杜运周, 刘秋辰, 程建青. 什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度?——基于制度组态的分析[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(9): 141-155. |
| Du Y Z, Liu Q C, Cheng J Q. What kind of ecosystem for doing business will contribute to city-level high entrepreneurial activity? A research based on institutional configurations[J]. Journal of Management World, 2020, 36(9): 141-155. | |
| [21] | 张茜松, 雷泽, 孙宁, 等. 如何协同资源和大数据分析能力实现双元创新?——基于资源编排理论的fsQCA分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2024, 45(11): 90-103. |
| Zhang Q S, Lei Z, Sun N, et al. How to combine resources and big data analysis capabilities to achieve ambidextrous innovation? A fsQCA research based on resource orchestration theory[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 2024, 45(11): 90-103. | |
| [22] | 杨忠海, 党春晓, 李瑛玫. 数字化转型能提升企业全员劳动生产率吗?——基于人力资本与双元创新的中介效应[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2023, 44(9): 30-46. |
| Yang Z H, Dang C X, Li Y M. Can digital transformation improve the overall labor productivity? Mediating effect of human capital and dual innovation[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 2023, 44(9): 30-46. | |
| [23] | 湛泳, 马从文. 专精特新“小巨人”企业培育对突破式创新的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2024, 21(4): 560-567. |
| Zhan Y, Ma C W. Study on the impact of the cultivation of SRDI ‘Small Giant’ enterprises on break through innovation[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2024, 21(4): 560-567. | |
| [24] | 张司飞, 陈勇岐. “专精特新”中小企业创新绩效提升路径研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2024, 42(4): 873-884, 896. |
| Zhang S F, Chen Y Q. Study on the improvement path of innovation performance of ‘SRDI’ small and medium - sized enterprises[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2024, 42(4): 873-884, 896. | |
| [25] | 杜运周, 孙宁, 刘秋辰. 运用混合方法发展和分析复杂中介模型——以营商环境促进创新活力,协同新质生产力和“就业优先”为例[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(6): 217-237. |
| Du Y Z, Sun N, Liu Q C. Developing and analyzing complex mediation models using mixed methods: An illustration of doing business promoting innovation vitality, synergizing new quality productive forces and employment-first[J]. Journal of Management World, 2024, 40(6): 217-237. | |
| [26] | 李大元, 刘晓亮, 刘浏, 等. 元宇宙企业高质量发展的多元组态路径——基于TOE框架[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2023, 45(7): 3-17. |
| Li D Y, Liu X L, Liu L, et al. Multifaceted paths for the high-quality development of metaverse enterprises: Based on the TOE framework[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2023, 45(7): 3-17. | |
| [27] |
Quintana-García C, Benavides-Velasco C A. Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification[J]. Research Policy, 2008, 37(3): 492-507.
DOI URL |
| [28] | 单伟, 孙一中, 施萧萧, 等. 组态视角下专精特新“小巨人”企业高质量发展驱动机制研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2025(1): 108-116. |
| Shan W, Sun Y Z, Shi X X, et al. Driving mechanism of high-quality development of SRDI ‘Little Giant’ enterprises under configuration view[J]. China Soft Science, 2025(1): 108-116. | |
| [29] | 陈岩, 侯宇琦, 马欣, 等. 智能化转型赋能企业高质量发展的路径和机制研究——基于发展新质生产力的视角[J]. 科研管理, 2025, 46(2): 32-42. |
| Chen Y, Hou Y Q, Ma X, et al. Research on the path and mechanism for the high-quality development of enterprises empowered by intelligent transformation: A study based on the perspective of developing new quality productive forces[J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(2): 32-42. | |
| [30] | 李治国, 王杰, 王博瀚. 碳排放权交易如何影响企业全要素生产率?[J]. 管理评论, 2025, 37(2): 31-43. |
| Li Z G, Wang J, Wang B H. How does carbon emissions trading affect the total factor productivity of enterprises?[J]. Management Review, 2025, 37(2): 31-43. | |
| [31] | 张茜松, 程嘉珍, 冯泰文, 等. 供应商绿色整合的多元驱动路径及其绩效研究——基于组态视角的分析[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(7): 323-338. |
| Zhang Q S, Cheng J Z, Feng T W, et al. Multiple driving paths and performance of green supplier integration: A research based on the configurational perspective[J]. Management Review, 2023, 35(7): 323-338. | |
| [32] | 赵云辉, 梁宇奇, 冯泰文, 等. 营商环境生态如何驱动城市经济韧性提升?——基于复杂系统观的组态分析[J]. 管理评论, 2025, 37(2): 57-71. |
| Zhao Y H, Liang Y Q, Feng T W, et al. How does business ecosystem drive urban economic resilience: A configuration analysis based on complex systems view[J]. Management Review, 2025, 37(2): 57-71. | |
| [33] |
孙大明, 胡苏敏, 朱天一, 等. 工业互联网平台如何驱动新质生产力发展——基于数据要素视角[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2025, 42(3): 38-49.
DOI |
| Sun D M, Hu S M, Zhu T Y, et al. How industrial internet platform drives the development of new quality productive forces: The perspective of data element[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2025, 42(3): 38-49. |
| [1] | 彭华涛 杨阳 吴双 潘月怡. 技术壁垒对国际创业企业高质量发展的影响研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2025, 43(12): 2597-2609. |
| [2] | 徐辉. 产业转移作用下的营商环境与区域高质量发展[J]. 科学学研究, 2025, 43(12): 2676-2688. |
| [3] | 王 山 余东华. 数字经济的降碳效应与作用路径研究———基于中国制造业碳排放效率的经验考察[J]. 科学学研究, 2024, 42(2): 310-321. |
| [4] | 钟世川 毛艳华. 数字技术偏向下制造业行业生产率的收敛效应[J]. 科学学研究, 2024, 42(12): 2509-2518. |
| [5] | 肖静 曾萍 任鸽. 如何提升制造业绿色转型绩效? ———基于TOE 框架的组态研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(12): 2162-2172. |
| [6] | 孙文浩 张杰. 中美贸易战何以影响制造业高质量发展[J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(9): 1559-1569. |
| [7] | 吴婷 易明. 人才的资源匹配、技术效率与经济高质量发展[J]. 科学学研究, 2019, 37(11): 1955-1963. |
| [8] | 于飞 胡泽民 董亮 陈祖胜. 知识耦合对企业突破式创新的影响机制研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(12): 2292-2304. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||