建制化科研:概念提出与发展逻辑

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

现代科学已成为组织化的科学,建制化科研成为科研活动最重要的组成形态。从多角度探讨了“建制化科研”概念提出的必要性,并从历史逻辑、理论逻辑、经验逻辑三个维度探讨建制化科研发展特征。研究发现:科学发展史既是科学知识生产史也是科学建制演进史,科研效率提升是科学建制演化的内在动力。知识生产模式Ⅱ的客观存在并不代表模式Ⅱ优于模式Ⅰ,不能简单地作为科研组织变革的依据。知识创新在学科高度分化与高度整合的双向互动中向前推进,是建制化科研深化的表现。知识体系塑造与之相适应的科研组织方式。知识体系架构中发挥主导作用的知识领域不同,形成建制化科研历史演进的宏观动态性。科研创新不是孤立实现的,需要科学-技术-仪器研制的互动,传统学科与前沿学科相互支撑,科研的专注与整合的有效设计,而这些结构性的配置安排,正是建制化科研不可替代的价值。本文为科技政策研究提供了新的视角,对未来我国科技体制改革具有理论和实践参考价值。

关键词: 建制化科研, 有组织科研, 知识生产, 科研机构

Abstract:

Science is not only an organized, objective, and reasonable knowledge system but also an institutionalized social activity. Contemporary science and technology have shown unprecedented institutionalized characteristics. A new notion of “institutionalized science research” is introduced in the context of policy necessary, and its distinctive characteristics are explored from historical logic, theoretical logic, and empirical logic. This paper demonstrates that the history of scientific development is also the history of scientific knowledge production and scientific institutional evolution. In the history of scientific institutional evolution, every major mode adjustment aims to optimize the conditions and organizational structure of scientific research, to continuously improve the efficiency of scientific research activities. Improving the efficiency of scientific research is the intrinsic motivation for the evolution of institutionalized science. The existence of knowledge production mode II does not mean that mode II is better than mode I. Knowledge production mode II cannot be simply used as a basis for transforming research institutes. Knowledge innovation advances by interaction in the two-way as highly split and integration of scientific disciplines, which reflects the evolution of standardized science research. The knowledge system shapes matching research organizations. The knowledge domains that play a leading role in the knowledge system architecture are different, forming a macro dynamic evolution of institutionalized science research history. As revealed by the experience of some famous scientific research institutions, scientific research innovation is not achieved in isolation, but requires an interaction between science, technology, and instrument development. Mutual support between traditional and cutting-edge disciplines is also important. Organizational design should take into account both the concentration and integration of scientific research. These structural resource allocations are the irreplaceable value of institutionalized science research. This paper provides a new perspective for research on science and technology policies and has theoretical and practical reference value for the future reform of China’s science and technology system.

Key words: institutionalized science research, organized science research, knowledge production, research institutes

中图分类号:

G644.6

赵兰香, 姚大志, 宋卿清. 建制化科研:概念提出与发展逻辑[J]. 科学学研究, 2024, 42(1): 108-117.

ZHAO Lan-xiang, YAO Da-zhi, SONG Qing-qing. Institutionalized science research: The concept and its development logic[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2024, 42(1): 108-117.

图/表 2

参考文献 32

[1]	白春礼. 强化国家战略科技力量[J]. 中国人大, 2021(7): 29-31.
	Bai C L. Strengthen national strategic scientific and technological strength[J]. The People's Congress of China, 2021(7): 29-31.
[2]	李红, 李强. 科学建制化的研究综述[J]. 湖北第二师范学院学报, 2010, 27(6): 73-75,126.
	Li H, Li Q. A Review of scientific institutionalization[J]. Journal of Hubei University of Education, 2010, 27(6): 73-75,126.
[3]	温珂, 蔡长塔, 潘韬, 等. 国立科研机构的建制化演进及发展趋势[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2019, 34(1): 71-78.
	Wen K, Cai C T, Pan T, et al. Evolution and trend of public research institutes’ institutionalization[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2019, 34(1):71-78.
[4]	李辉, 房超, 黎晓东. 美国国家实验室运行管理经验与启示[J]. 实验技术与管理, 2023, 40(3): 243-249,254.
	Li H, Fang C, Li X D. Experience and enlightenment of American National Laboratory operation management[J]. Experimental Technology and Management, 2023, 40(3): 243-249,254.
[5]	王剑. 海洋领域重点实验室建设与运行管理思考[J]. 海洋开发与管理, 2020, 37(3): 23-26.
	Wang J. The construction and management of Marine Key Laboratories[J]. Ocean Development and Management, 2020, 37(3): 23-26.
[6]	Mezhouda A. Strategic planning of scientific research activities: What is the added value for algerian research institutions?[J]. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 2019, 18(3): 261-277.
[7]	鲁世林, 李侠. 国外顶尖国家实验室建设的主要特点、核心经验与顶层设计[J]. 科学管理研究, 2023, 41(1): 165-172.
	Lu S L, Li X. Main features, core experience and top-level design of the construction of top foreign national laboratories[J]. Scientific Management Research, 2023, 41(1): 165-172.
[8]	Whelan R C. Management of scientific institutions NPL 1995-98: The transition from agency to government-owned contractor operated (GOCO)[J]. R&D Management, 2000, 30(4): 313-322. DOI URL
[9]	Coccia M. Structure and organisational behaviour of public research institutions under unstable growth of human resources[J]. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 2014, 20(4-6): 251-266. DOI URL
[10]	Turpin T, Deville A. Occupational roles and expectations of research scientists and research managers in scientific research institutions[J]. R&D Management, 1995, 25(2): 141-157. DOI URL
[11]	薛培元. 国外典型国家实验室知识产权管理模式与启示[J]. 河南科技, 2018(6): 48-50.
	Xue P Y. The model and enlightenment of intellectual property management of typical national laboratories abroad[J]. Henan Science and Technology, 2018(6): 48-50.
[12]	陈套. 发挥国家战略科技力量建制化优势[N]. 解放军报, 2019-07-05.
	Chen T. Give full play to the institutional advantages of the country's strategic scientific and technological forces[N]. PLA Daily, 2019-07-05.
[13]	使命驱动的建制化基础研究中国科学院“基础研究十条”[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(12): 1388-1390.
	Mission-driven basic research on institutionalization Chinese Academy of Sciences "Ten Basic Research Principles"[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(12): 1388-1390.
[14]	雷朝滋. 以“三个破解”加强高校有组织科研[J]. 瞭望, 2022(47): 3.
	Lei C Z. Strengthen organized scientific research in universities with "Three Solutions"[J]. Outlook, 2022(47): 3.
[15]	曾粤亮, 司莉. 自由探索还是有组织科研:跨学科科研合作的内涵、类型与特点[J]. 图书情报知识, 2023, 40(4): 81-91,51.
	Zeng Y L, Si L. Free exploration or organized research: Connotation, types and characteristics of interdisciplinary research collaboration[J]. Documentation,Information & Knowledge, 2023, 40(4): 81-91,51.
[16]	Colyvas J A, Powell W W. Roads to Institutionalization: The remaking of boundaries between public and private science[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2006, 27: 305-353. DOI URL
[17]	刘霁堂. 科学建制化过程与科学家科普责任演变[J]. 科学学研究, 2003(6): 591-595.
	Liu J T. The Organizational systematization course of science and the evolution of duty of science popularization of scientists[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2003(6):591-595.
[18]	张盖伦. 瞄准国际科技前沿和国家重大需求教育部加强有组织科研[N]. 2022-07-20.
	Zhang G L. Aiming at the frontiers of international science and technology and major national needs, the ministry of education strengthened organized scientific research[N]. Science and Technology Daily, 2023(7): 28-37.
[19]	白强. 高校有组织科研:发展趋势、逻辑转向与机制创新——基于知识生产模式变革视角的分析[J]. 江苏高教, 2023(7): 28-37.
	Bai Q. Organized scientific research in coleges and universities: Development trend,logical turn and mechanism inovation[J]. Jiangsu Higher Education, 2023(7): 28-37.
[20]	潘教峰, 鲁晓, 王光辉. 科学研究模式变迁:有组织的基础研究[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(12): 1395-1403.
	Pan J F, Lu X, Wang G H. Transforming scientific research: Organized basic research[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(12): 1395-1403.
[21]	李彦姝. 高校哲学社会科学“有组织科研”理论研讨会综述[J]. 中国高校社会科学, 2022(5): 155-156.
	Li Y S. Summary of the seminar on "Organized Scientific Research" in philosophy and social sciences in universities[J]. Social Sciences in Chinese Higher Education Institutions, 2022(5): 155-156.
[22]	龙云安, 胡能贵, 陈国庆, 等. 培育我国国家战略科技力量建制化新优势研究[J]. 科学管理研究, 2017, 35(2): 18-21.
	Long Y A, Hu N G, Chen G Q, et al. Research on the new advantages of cultivating our country’s national strategic science and technology power[J]. Scientific Management Research, 2017, 35(2):18-21.
[23]	陈霞玲. 高校开展有组织科研的组织模式、经验特征与问题对策[J]. 国家教育行政学院学报, 2023(7): 78-87.
	Chen X L. Organizational model, empirical characteristics, problem and suggestions of organized scientific and research in colleges and universities[J]. Journal of National Academy of Education Administration, 2023(7): 78-87.
[24]	许治, 杨芳芳, 陈月娉. 重大科研项目合作困境——基于有组织无序视角的解释[J]. 科学学研究, 2016, 34(10): 1515-1521,1540.
	Xu Z, Yang F F, Chen Y P. Study on the collaboration dilemma of major scientific research projects: Based on organized disorder[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2016, 34(10): 1515-1521,1540.
[25]	吴依云. 从科学的社会史到科学的社会建制——默顿科学社会学阶段性比较分析[J]. 社科纵横(新理论版), 2008(3):16-17,20.
	Wu Y Y. From the social history of science to the social organization of science: A comparative analysis of the stages of Merton's sociology of science[J]. Social Science Review, 2008(3):16-17,20.
[26]	Kinsella W J. Rhetoric, action, and agency in institutionalized science and technology[J]. Technical Communication Quarterly, 2005, 14(3): 303-310. DOI URL
[27]	王延中. 科研项目课题制的几个问题[J]. 学术界, 2007(4): 47-60.
	Wang Y Z. Several problems of research project system[J]. Academics, 2007(4): 47-60.
[28]	倪思洁. 大科学装置如何推动建制化基础科学研究[N]. 中国科学报, 2023-03-09.
	Ni S J. How can big science devices promote structured basic science research[N]. Chinese Journal of Science, 2023-03-09.
[29]	理查德·惠特利. 科学的智力组织和社会组织[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2011:2.
	Whitley R. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Science[M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2011:2.
[30]	Gibbons M, Limoges C, Noweoyny H. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary[M]. London: Sage Publications, 1994:6.
[31]	李正风. 科学知识生产方式及其演变[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2006:290-292.
	Li Z F. Production Mode of Scientific Knowledge and its Evolution[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2006:290-292.
[32]	韦进, 何杨勇. 对英国高教界知识生产模式划分争论的分析[J]. 高等教育研究, 2013, 34(10): 96-100.
	Wei J, He Y Y. The review of debate on the clasification of knowledge Mode 1 and Mode 2 in the UK higher education[J]. Journal of Higher Education, 2013, 34(10): 96-100.