科学学研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1276-1287.
收稿日期:2025-04-11
修回日期:2025-06-12
出版日期:2026-06-15
发布日期:2026-06-15
通讯作者:
丁明磊(1976-),男,研究员,博士, E-mail: 作者简介:纳尔江·阿海(2001-),男,哈萨克族,硕士研究生。基金资助:
Naerjiang·Ahai 1, DONG Bo-wei2, DING Ming-lei3(
)
Received:2025-04-11
Revised:2025-06-12
Online:2026-06-15
Published:2026-06-15
摘要:
本研究以政府数据平台上线为准自然实验,基于2009年至2023年中国高校专利转让数据,采用多期双重差分模型探究了公共数据开放对高校科技成果转化的影响。研究结果表明,公共数据开放对高校科技成果转化具有积极促进作用,其机制在于,公共数据开放将通过推动校企合作创新和缓解专利转化时滞两个渠道促进高校科技成果转化。异质性分析表明,公共数据开放在数据开放质量更高和数字基础设施条件更好的地区对高校科技成果转化的作用更大,对发明类型专利和高质量专利转化的促进作用更明显。本研究揭示了公共数据开放对高校科技成果转化的促进作用,为打通高校科技成果转化的“最后一公里”,健全科技成果转化服务体系,实现产学研协同发展提供了实证经验。
中图分类号:
纳尔江·阿海, 董博为, 丁明磊. 公共数据开放能否促进高校科技成果转化——基于政府数据平台上线的准自然实验[J]. 科学学研究, 2026, 44(6): 1276-1287.
Naerjiang·Ahai , DONG Bo-wei, DING Ming-lei. Does public data openness promote technology transfer in higher education institutions? ——Based on a quasi-natural experiment of government data platform access[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2026, 44(6): 1276-1287.
| 变量 | 样本量 | 平均值 | 标准差 | 最小值 | 最大值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 高校专利转让 | 3165 | 42.414 | 109.831 | 0 | 1293.000 |
| 公共数据开放 | 3165 | 0.210 | 0.407 | 0 | 1.000 |
| 校企联合专利申请 | 3165 | 4.716 | 15.257 | 0 | 230.000 |
| 平均DPI专利质量 | 2431 | 2.785 | 1.174 | 0 | 5.000 |
| 平均专利转化时滞 | 2431 | 41.220 | 23.401 | 0 | 164.500 |
| 发明专利 | 3165 | 34.207 | 88.150 | 0 | 590.000 |
| 实用专利 | 3165 | 6.672 | 18.818 | 0 | 288.000 |
| 外观设计专利 | 3165 | 0.240 | 1.427 | 0 | 25.000 |
| 城市金融资源 | 3165 | 1.122 | 0.680 | 0.165 | 7.450 |
| 城市发展水平 | 3165 | 10.816 | 0.598 | 8.817 | 12.404 |
| 城市发展能力 | 3165 | 8.357 | 4.179 | -20.630 | 23.960 |
| 城市产业结构 | 3165 | 43.393 | 10.347 | 9.760 | 84.850 |
| 城市人力资本 | 3165 | 0.025 | 0.029 | 0.001 | 0.203 |
| 高新企业数量 | 3165 | 1675.902 | 1907.358 | 21.000 | 17906.000 |
表1 描述性统计
Table 1 Descriptive statistics
| 变量 | 样本量 | 平均值 | 标准差 | 最小值 | 最大值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 高校专利转让 | 3165 | 42.414 | 109.831 | 0 | 1293.000 |
| 公共数据开放 | 3165 | 0.210 | 0.407 | 0 | 1.000 |
| 校企联合专利申请 | 3165 | 4.716 | 15.257 | 0 | 230.000 |
| 平均DPI专利质量 | 2431 | 2.785 | 1.174 | 0 | 5.000 |
| 平均专利转化时滞 | 2431 | 41.220 | 23.401 | 0 | 164.500 |
| 发明专利 | 3165 | 34.207 | 88.150 | 0 | 590.000 |
| 实用专利 | 3165 | 6.672 | 18.818 | 0 | 288.000 |
| 外观设计专利 | 3165 | 0.240 | 1.427 | 0 | 25.000 |
| 城市金融资源 | 3165 | 1.122 | 0.680 | 0.165 | 7.450 |
| 城市发展水平 | 3165 | 10.816 | 0.598 | 8.817 | 12.404 |
| 城市发展能力 | 3165 | 8.357 | 4.179 | -20.630 | 23.960 |
| 城市产业结构 | 3165 | 43.393 | 10.347 | 9.760 | 84.850 |
| 城市人力资本 | 3165 | 0.025 | 0.029 | 0.001 | 0.203 |
| 高新企业数量 | 3165 | 1675.902 | 1907.358 | 21.000 | 17906.000 |
| 变量 | (1) | (2) |
|---|---|---|
| Patent Transfer | Patent Transfer | |
| Open | 19.703** | 20.207** |
| (7.991) | (8.006) | |
| 常数项 | 38.280*** | 90.993 |
| (1.677) | (92.755) | |
| 控制变量 | NO | YES |
| 固定效应 | YES | YES |
| 样本量 | 3165 | 3165 |
| Adj.R2 | 0.796 | 0.801 |
表2 基准回归结果
Table 2 Baseline regression results
| 变量 | (1) | (2) |
|---|---|---|
| Patent Transfer | Patent Transfer | |
| Open | 19.703** | 20.207** |
| (7.991) | (8.006) | |
| 常数项 | 38.280*** | 90.993 |
| (1.677) | (92.755) | |
| 控制变量 | NO | YES |
| 固定效应 | YES | YES |
| 样本量 | 3165 | 3165 |
| Adj.R2 | 0.796 | 0.801 |
| 平均处理效应 | 权重 | |
|---|---|---|
| 以“从未处理组”为控制组 | 10.701 | 0.577 |
| 以“尚未处理组”为控制组 | 35.134 | 0.406 |
| 以“早期处理组”为控制组 | -15.000 | 0.016 |
表3 培根分解结果
Table 3 Bacon decompose results
| 平均处理效应 | 权重 | |
|---|---|---|
| 以“从未处理组”为控制组 | 10.701 | 0.577 |
| 以“尚未处理组”为控制组 | 35.134 | 0.406 |
| 以“早期处理组”为控制组 | -15.000 | 0.016 |
| 变量 | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSM-DID | 排除其他政策干扰 | |||||
| Open | 13.518* | 20.207** | 17.420** | 17.323** | 19.131** | 20.516** |
| (7.114) | (8.006) | (7.754) | (7.920) | (7.786) | (7.996) | |
| Xxhm | 54.305*** | |||||
| (13.091) | ||||||
| Zwfw | 41.664*** | |||||
| (12.567) | ||||||
| Kdzg | 15.602** | |||||
| (6.948) | ||||||
| Data | 4.476 | |||||
| (8.500) | ||||||
| 常数项 | 25.629 | 90.993 | 3.389 | 15.948 | 67.020 | 87.821 |
| (78.880) | (92.755) | (91.198) | (93.247) | (92.186) | (91.224) | |
| 控制变量 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| 固定效应 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| 样本量 | 2997 | 3165 | 3165 | 3165 | 3165 | 3165 |
| Adj.R2 | 0.803 | 0.801 | 0.812 | 0.808 | 0.802 | 0.801 |
表4 稳健性检验Ⅰ
Table 4 Robustness testⅠ
| 变量 | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSM-DID | 排除其他政策干扰 | |||||
| Open | 13.518* | 20.207** | 17.420** | 17.323** | 19.131** | 20.516** |
| (7.114) | (8.006) | (7.754) | (7.920) | (7.786) | (7.996) | |
| Xxhm | 54.305*** | |||||
| (13.091) | ||||||
| Zwfw | 41.664*** | |||||
| (12.567) | ||||||
| Kdzg | 15.602** | |||||
| (6.948) | ||||||
| Data | 4.476 | |||||
| (8.500) | ||||||
| 常数项 | 25.629 | 90.993 | 3.389 | 15.948 | 67.020 | 87.821 |
| (78.880) | (92.755) | (91.198) | (93.247) | (92.186) | (91.224) | |
| 控制变量 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| 固定效应 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| 样本量 | 2997 | 3165 | 3165 | 3165 | 3165 | 3165 |
| Adj.R2 | 0.803 | 0.801 | 0.812 | 0.808 | 0.802 | 0.801 |
| 变量 | (1) | (2) | (3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patent Transfer | Patent Transfer | Patent Transfer | |
| Open | 5.812** | 5.513** | 4.593** |
| (2.405) | (2.275) | (2.205) | |
| 控制变量1次项 | YES | YES | YES |
| 控制变量2次项 | NO | YES | YES |
| 控制变量3次项 | NO | NO | YES |
| 固定效应 | YES | YES | YES |
| 样本量 | 3165 | 3165 | 3165 |
表5 双重机器学习因果检验结果
Table 5 Double machine learning causality test
| 变量 | (1) | (2) | (3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patent Transfer | Patent Transfer | Patent Transfer | |
| Open | 5.812** | 5.513** | 4.593** |
| (2.405) | (2.275) | (2.205) | |
| 控制变量1次项 | YES | YES | YES |
| 控制变量2次项 | NO | YES | YES |
| 控制变量3次项 | NO | NO | YES |
| 固定效应 | YES | YES | YES |
| 样本量 | 3165 | 3165 | 3165 |
| 变量 | (1) | (2) | (3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joint Patent | Long Time Interval | Short Time Interval | |
| Open | 4.116*** | 26.807* | 9.219* |
| (1.392) | (14.035) | (5.059) | |
| 常数项 | 22.468 | 266.619 | -16.988 |
| (15.761) | (183.521) | (44.219) | |
| 控制变量 | YES | YES | YES |
| 固定效应 | YES | YES | YES |
| 样本量 | 3165 | 1500 | 1665 |
| Adj.R2 | 0.743 | 0.807 | 0.698 |
表6 机制分析结果
Table 6 Analysis of mechanisms
| 变量 | (1) | (2) | (3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joint Patent | Long Time Interval | Short Time Interval | |
| Open | 4.116*** | 26.807* | 9.219* |
| (1.392) | (14.035) | (5.059) | |
| 常数项 | 22.468 | 266.619 | -16.988 |
| (15.761) | (183.521) | (44.219) | |
| 控制变量 | YES | YES | YES |
| 固定效应 | YES | YES | YES |
| 样本量 | 3165 | 1500 | 1665 |
| Adj.R2 | 0.743 | 0.807 | 0.698 |
| 变量 | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invention Patent | Utility Patent | Design Patent | High Quality Patent | Low Quality Patent | |
| Open | 13.423** | 5.049** | 0.326*** | 35.244* | 10.851 |
| (5.468) | (2.109) | (0.121) | (18.594) | (7.279) | |
| 常数项 | 31.002 | 47.491 | 4.041 | 141.604 | 3.896 |
| (70.173) | (29.986) | (2.833) | (234.343) | (95.708) | |
| 控制变量 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| 固定效应 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| 样本量 | 3165 | 3165 | 3165 | 1080 | 2085 |
| Adj. R2 | 0.824 | 0.476 | 0.215 | 0.844 | 0.759 |
表7 专利的异质性分析
Table 7 Results of patent heterogeneity analysis
| 变量 | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invention Patent | Utility Patent | Design Patent | High Quality Patent | Low Quality Patent | |
| Open | 13.423** | 5.049** | 0.326*** | 35.244* | 10.851 |
| (5.468) | (2.109) | (0.121) | (18.594) | (7.279) | |
| 常数项 | 31.002 | 47.491 | 4.041 | 141.604 | 3.896 |
| (70.173) | (29.986) | (2.833) | (234.343) | (95.708) | |
| 控制变量 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| 固定效应 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| 样本量 | 3165 | 3165 | 3165 | 1080 | 2085 |
| Adj. R2 | 0.824 | 0.476 | 0.215 | 0.844 | 0.759 |
| 变量 | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High Quality | Low Quality | High Infrastructure | Low Infrastructure | |
| Open | 61.602* | 2.583 | 26.817** | 0.020 |
| (35.427) | (5.054) | (13.081) | (1.824) | |
| 常数项 | 134.719 | -43.693 | 101.909 | 38.183 |
| (535.548) | (63.812) | (183.775) | (42.688) | |
| 控制变量 | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| 固定效应 | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| 样本量 | 585 | 2580 | 1695 | 1470 |
| Adj. R2 | 0.834 | 0.733 | 0.804 | 0.545 |
表8 区位要素的异质性分析
Table 8 Results of location heterogeneity analysis
| 变量 | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High Quality | Low Quality | High Infrastructure | Low Infrastructure | |
| Open | 61.602* | 2.583 | 26.817** | 0.020 |
| (35.427) | (5.054) | (13.081) | (1.824) | |
| 常数项 | 134.719 | -43.693 | 101.909 | 38.183 |
| (535.548) | (63.812) | (183.775) | (42.688) | |
| 控制变量 | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| 固定效应 | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| 样本量 | 585 | 2580 | 1695 | 1470 |
| Adj. R2 | 0.834 | 0.733 | 0.804 | 0.545 |
| [1] |
Abhishek N. The private impact of public data: Landsat satellite maps increased gold discoveries and encouraged entry[J]. Management Science, 2021, 68(1):564-582.
DOI URL |
| [2] | 方锦程, 刘颖, 高昊宇, 等. 公共数据开放能否促进区域协调发展?——来自政府数据平台上线的准自然实验[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(9):124-142. |
| Fang J C, Liu Y, Gao H Y. Does public data access promote regional harmonious development? On a quasi-natural experiment of government data platform access[J]. Journal of Management World, 2023, 39(9):124-142. | |
| [3] | 赵公民, 吕京芹, 王仰东, 等. 互联网背景下“双一流”高校科技成果转化效率研究[J]. 软科学, 2021, 35(8):45-50. |
| Zhao G M, Lu J Q, Wang Y D. Research on transformation efficiency of “double first-class” universities under the background of internet[J]. Soft Science, 2021, 35(8):45-50. | |
| [4] | 沈坤荣, 林剑威. 链“岛”成“陆”:公共数据开放的技术创新效应研究[J]. 管理世界, 2025, 41(2):83-104. |
| Shen K R, Lin J W. Linking islands into continent: The impact of public data openness on technological innovation[J]. Journal of Management World, 2025, 41(2):83-104. | |
| [5] | 蔡运坤, 周京奎, 袁旺平. 数据要素共享与城市创业活力——来自公共数据开放的经验证据[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 41(8):5-25. |
| Cai Y K, Zhou J K, Yuan W P. Data factor sharing and urban entrepreneurial vitality: Empirical evidence from public data openness[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2024, 41(8):5-25. | |
| [6] | 郭立祥, 岳书敬, 张鑫和. 数据开放对制造业与服务业融合的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2026, 47(3):34-43. |
| Guo L X, Yue S J, Zhang X H. Research on impact of data openness on the integration of manufacturing and service industries[J]. Science Research Management, 2026, 47(3):34-43. | |
| [7] |
吴武清, 李祁恒, 章柳漪, 等. 公共数据资源与企业全要素生产率——基于地方政府数据开放的准自然实验[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2024, 44(6):1815-1833.
DOI |
| Wu W Q, Li Q H, Zhang L Y. Public data resources and total factor productivity of enterprises — A quasi-natural experiment based on local government data opening[J]. Systems Engineering — Theory & Practice, 2024, 44(6):1815-1833. | |
| [8] |
刘宇, 梁栋, 张硕. 公共数据资源与企业可持续发展——基于政府数据开放的准自然实验[J]. 计量经济学报, 2025, 5(1):109-128.
DOI |
|
Liu Y, Liang D, Zhang S. Public data resources and corporate sustainable development: A quasi-natural experiment based on government data openness[J]. China Journal of Econometrics, 2025, 5(1):109-128.
DOI |
|
| [9] | 谢尚, 赵鹏军. 公共数据开放与城乡居民收入增长:来自政府数据平台上线的证据[J]. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 23(3):61-75. |
| Xie S, Zhao P J. Public data openness and urban-rural residents’ income growth: Evidence from the government data open platform[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 23(3):61-75. | |
| [10] | 钟卫, 陈宝明. 中国高校科技成果转化绩效评价研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018(4):41-49. |
| Zhong W, Chen B M. Assessment of the efficiency of scientific and technological achievements transformation in Chinese universities[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2018(4):41-49. | |
| [11] | 杨阳, 刘文飞, 丁堃. 高校专利技术转移绩效评价指标构建及实证[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(7):189-199. |
| Yang Y, Liu W F, Ding K. Construction of the performance evaluation indicators of patented technology transfer in universities and its empirical research[J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(7):189-199. | |
| [12] | 孙林波, 陈劲. 学术商业化绩效分析——以中国重点大学为例[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(11):2011-2018,2091. |
| Sun L B, Chen J. The path of ambidextrous innovation,knowledge field and intellectual property capacity[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2018, 36(11):2011-2018,2091. | |
| [13] | 孙玉涛, 刘小萌. 高校研发合作网络位置与技术成果转移——技术转移中心的调节作用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(8):3-12. |
| Sun Y T, Liu X M. University's position in R&D cooperation network and technology transfer: The moderator effect of technology transfer center[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.&T., 2018, 39(8):3-12. | |
| [14] | 胡凯, 王炜哲. 如何打通高校科技成果转化的“最后一公里”?——基于技术转移办公室体制的考察[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(4):5-27. |
| Hu K, Wang W Z. How to get through the“last mile”of technology transfer of universities?Research based on the technology transfer office system[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2023, 40(4):5-27. | |
| [15] |
Anderson R T, Daim U T, Lavoie F F. Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer[J]. Technovation, 2006, 27(5):306-318.
DOI URL |
| [16] | 郭金忠, 刘成勇, 刘晓玲, 等. 中国高校科技创新效率及影响因素的实证分析——科技成果产出和转化两阶段视角[J]. 科技管理研究, 2024, 44(6):97-106. |
| Guo J Z, Liu C Y, Liu X L, et al. Empirical analysis of the efficiency and influencing factors of scientific and technological innovation in Chinese universities: A two-stage perspective of scientific and technological output and transformation[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2024, 44(6):97-106. | |
| [17] |
Wenjing W, Yiwei L. Industrial funding and university technology transfer: The moderating role of intellectual property rights enforcement[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2022, 47(5):1549-1572.
DOI |
| [18] | 易巍, 龙小宁. 高校知识溢出对异质性企业创新的影响[J]. 经济管理, 2021, 43(7):120-135. |
| Wei Y, Long X N. Research on the impact of university knowledge spillover on heterogeneous enterprise innovation[J]. Business and Management Journal, 2021, 43(7):120-135. | |
| [19] | 马荣康, 李少敏. 地理距离阻碍大学—企业技术转移速度吗?——大学制度背景与研发网络嵌入的调节作用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2019, 40(11):32-44. |
| Ma R K, Li S M. Does geographical distance hinder the speed of university-industry technology transfer in China? The moderating effects of university institutional backgrounds and R&D network embeddedness[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.&T., 2019, 40(11):32-44. | |
| [20] |
张天雪, 许志通, 马银琦. 新质生产力跃迁之钥:高校科技成果转化的驱动路径与门槛效应[J]. 中国高教研究, 2025(1):83-91.
DOI |
|
Zhang T X, Xu Z T, Ma Y Q. The key to the transition of new quality productive forces: The driving path and threshold effect of the transformation of scientific and technological achievements in universities[J]. China Higher Education Research, 2025(1):83-91.
DOI |
|
| [21] |
Macho-Stadler I, Pérez-Castrillo D, Veugelers R. Licensing of university inventions: The role of a technology transfer office[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2006, 25(3):483-510.
DOI URL |
| [22] | 陈剑, 黄朔, 刘运辉. 从赋能到使能——数字化环境下的企业运营管理[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(2):117-128,222. |
| Chen J, Huang S, Liu Y H. Operations management in the digitization era:From empowering to enabling[J]. Journal of Management World, 2020, 36(2):117-128,222. | |
| [23] | 叶静怡, 杨洋, 韩佳伟, 等. 投入、隐性因素与大学技术成果转化——基于中国大学专利出售数据的实证分析[J]. 经济科学, 2014(5):103-117. |
| Ye J Y, Yang Y, Han J W, et al. Input, unobserved factors and university technology transfer—An empirical analysis of China universities patent data[J]. Economic Science, 2014(5):103-117. | |
| [24] | 张文杰, 林璐, 哈巍. 高校同城新建校区对科技成果产出的影响研究[J]. 重庆高教研究, 2025, 13(2):106-116. |
| Zhang W J, Lin L, Ha W. Research on the impact of newly built campus in the same city on the output of scientific and technological achievements[J]. Chongqing Higher Education Research, 2025, 13(2):106-116. | |
| [25] | 刘冲, 沙学康, 张妍. 交错双重差分:处理效应异质性与估计方法选择[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2022, 39(9):177-204. |
| Liu C, Sha X K, Zhang Y. Staggered difference-in-differences method: Heterogeneous treatment effects and choice of estimation[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2022, 39(9):177-204. | |
| [26] | 李华龙, 李钟文, 杨珂凡, 等. 大数据政策能否催生企业新质生产力——基于国家级大数据综合试验区的准自然实验[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2025(2):137-149. |
| Li H L, Li Z W, Yang K F, et al. How big data policy foster new quality productive forces in enterprise: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of the national big data comprehensive pilot zone[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2025(2):137-149. | |
| [27] | 宋弘, 陆毅. 如何有效增加理工科领域人才供给?——来自拔尖学生培养计划的实证研究[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(2):52-67. |
| Song H, Lu Y. How to increase talents in science effectively: Empirical evidence from a talent training program in China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2020, 55(2):52-67. | |
| [28] | 黎文靖, 郑曼妮. 实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(4):60-73. |
| Li W J, Zheng M N. Is it substantive innovation or strategic innovation? Impact of macroeconomic policies on micro-enterprises’ innovation[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2016, 51(4):60-73. | |
| [29] | 朱雪忠, 李艳. 我国中药发明专利质量提升路径——基于专利委托代理视角的实证研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2021, 42(7):87-105. |
| Zhu X S, Li Y. The path to improve the quality of traditional Chinese medicine invention patents: An empirical study based on the perspective of patent agency[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.&.T, 2021, 42(7):87-105. | |
| [30] | 孙伟增, 毛宁, 兰峰, 等. 政策赋能、数字生态与企业数字化转型——基于国家大数据综合试验区的准自然实验[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(9):117-135. |
| Sun W Z, Mao N, Lan F. Policy empowerment, digital ecosystem and enterprise digital transformation: A quasi-natural experiment based on the national big data comprehensive perimental zone[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2023(9):117-135. |
| [1] | 王为东 王笑楠 江红莉. 低碳城市建设能否加快低碳技术知识流动?[J]. 科学学研究, 2023, 41(12): 2204-2215. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||