• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1288-1296.

• 创新探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

从“邻避效应”到“邻利工程”———九峰垃圾焚烧发电工程社会伦理治理的案例研究

顾萍   

  1. 中国农业大学
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-19 修回日期:2025-07-09 出版日期:2026-06-15 发布日期:2026-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 顾萍
  • 基金资助:
    新时代生态文明建设伟大成就融入高校思政课教学研究;科普服务科技创新发展研究

From "NIMBY Effect" to "Neighborhood-Benefit Project": A Case Study on Socio-Ethical Governance in the Hangzhou Jiufeng Waste-to-Energy Project

  • Received:2025-03-19 Revised:2025-07-09 Online:2026-06-15 Published:2026-06-15

摘要: 邻避效应作为环境敏感型工程建设的典型治理难题,本质源于技术理性与社会伦理价值的结构性失衡。本文基于社会伦理治理视角,以杭州九峰垃圾焚烧发电工程为案例,在实地调研基础上系统解析其从“邻避效应”向“邻利工程”转变的内在机制与实践路径。九峰工程通过树立“大工程”理念重构治理范式,将垃圾焚烧项目定位为技术工程与社会工程的有机结合,从技术创新与社会变革双重维度构建邻避效应治理机制;通过技术革新、经济补偿和社会协同三维联动拓展项目利益空间,实现环境效益与社会效益的共生增值;基于利益相关者分析构建动态协调机制,形成合理的风险分担与利益分配方案,推动可持续的利益平衡;通过规范政府、企业与公众三方主体行为,建立持续迭代的社会伦理治理体系。九峰工程从“邻避效应”到“邻利工程”的治理经验为同类工程破解邻避难题提供了实践样本。

Abstract: The Not-In-My-Backyard (NIMBY) effect, as a typical governance challenge in environmentally sensitive infrastructure projects, fundamentally stems from the structural imbalance between technological rationality and socio-ethical values. From the perspective of socio-ethical governance, this study takes the Hangzhou Jiufeng Waste-to-Energy Project as a case to systematically analyze the internal mechanisms and practical pathways of its transformation from the "NIMBY effect" to a "Neighborhood-Benefit Project," based on field investigations. By adopting a "macro-engineering" philosophy to reconstruct governance paradigms, the Jiufeng Project repositions waste incineration as an organic integration of technological and social engineering, establishing a NIMBY governance mechanism through dual dimensions of technological innovation and social reform. Through tripartite synergies of technological advancement, economic compensation, and social collaboration, the project expands its value space to achieve symbiotic enhancement of environmental and social benefits. A dynamic coordination mechanism is developed via stakeholder analysis to formulate rational risk-sharing and benefit-distribution schemes, thereby promoting sustainable interest balance. Additionally, by standardizing the behaviors of government, enterprises, and the public, the project establishes an iterative socio-ethical governance framework. The governance experience of the Jiufeng Project in transitioning from a "NIMBY effect" to a "Neighborhood-Benefit Project" provides a practical model for resolving similar governance dilemmas in comparable infrastructure projects.