• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 1911-1923.

• 创新探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

知识产权示范城市推动了数字协同创新吗?

左勇华1,2,匡慧姝3,刘政4,余龙2   

  1. 1. 江西师范大学数学与信息科学学院
    2. 清华大学深圳研究生院
    3. 江西师范大学经济与管理学院
    4. 江西师范大学管理科学与工程研究中心
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-09 修回日期:2025-10-17 出版日期:2026-09-15 发布日期:2026-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 匡慧姝
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金“数字‘耗能—赋能’视角下制造企业数字化转型能力解构与动力重塑:机制、影响及对策”;国家自然科学基金“动态能力视角下数字技术赋能制造企业合作创新的能力基础、能动转换及扩散机制研究”;国家自然科学基金“制度嵌入视角下企业投资激励与产能出清的非对称应对效应及工业去产能机制重构”

Can the construction of intellectual property demonstration cities promote digital collaborative innovation among enterprises?

  • Received:2025-06-09 Revised:2025-10-17 Online:2026-09-15 Published:2026-09-15
  • Contact: Kuang HuiShu

摘要: 知识产权公共政策能否保障跨组织数字创新产权,推动企业数字协同创新?基于2011-2023年A股上市公司数据,本文以知识产权示范城市为准自然试验,用联合授权数字专利表征数字协同创新,检验了知识产权示范城市影响数字协同创新的效应与机制。研究发现:知识产权示范城市建设促进企业平均数字协同创新率提升25%,说明知识产权公共政策有助于破解跨组织数字创新产权难题,打通跨组织“数实融合”通道。异质性检验发现,知识产权示范城市对数字协同创新的影响仅存本地创造效应,空间溢出不明显;数字创新基础弱、经历初创成长阶段以及民营类“弱”企业,更易借助知识产权公共政策插上数创协同“翅膀”。就机制而言,增强多主体关系联结、促进基础研究扩散以及强化知识产权执法,都是知识产权示范城市推动企业数字协同创新的重要机制。研究结论为完善知识产权制度创新、构建数字创新联合体等提供理论指导与实践启示。

Abstract: Can intellectual property public policies safeguard cross organizational digital innovation property rights and promote enterprise digital collaborative innovation? Based on the data of A-share listed companies from 2011 to 2023, this article takes intellectual property demonstration cities as a quasi natural experiment, uses jointly authorized digital patents to represent digital collaborative innovation, and tests the effects and mechanisms of intellectual property demonstration cities on digital collaborative innovation. Research has found that the construction of intellectual property demonstration cities promotes a 25% increase in the average digital collaborative innovation rate of enterprises, indicating that intellectual property public policies can help solve the problem of cross organizational digital innovation property rights and open up the channel for cross organizational "integration of data and reality". Heterogeneity testing found that digital collaborative innovation in the construction of intellectual property demonstration cities only has local creation effects, and spatial spillover effects are not significant; Weak foundations in digital innovation, experienced start-up growth stages, and "weak" enterprises such as private enterprises are more likely to leverage intellectual property public policies to give wings to digital innovation collaboration. In terms of mechanisms, enhancing the connection of multiple stakeholders, promoting the diffusion of basic research, and strengthening intellectual property law enforcement are all important mechanisms for promoting digital collaborative innovation among enterprises in intellectual property demonstration cities. The research conclusion provides theoretical guidance and practical inspiration for improving the innovation of intellectual property system and building a digital innovation consortium.

中图分类号: